IBJNews

Lilly Endowment sells Lilly stock for first time since '08

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lilly Endowment sold 150,000 shares of Eli Lilly and Co. stock Monday, resuming an asset-diversification plan suspended when stock prices swooned in 2008.

The Indianapolis-based foundation said it will use stock-sale proceeds—about $8.8 million based on Monday’s $58.97 closing price, with future sales likely—to fund grants and operations while broadening its investment portfolio.

Established in 1937 with the gift of Lilly stock by members of the founder’s family, Lilly Endowment still owns more than 135 million shares, or a 12-percent stake, enough to make it the pharmaceutical firm’s largest investor.

Lilly shares represented almost all of the endowment’s assets for decades, but its board in 2006 announced plans to sell $2 billion of stock to diversify its holdings. By then, most other large foundations had already taken that step to limit financial volatility.

The endowment sold $390 million worth of Lilly shares through September 2008, reinvesting the money in indexed mutual funds. Then, share prices slumped and the selloff stopped.

Lilly Endowment lost 26 percent of its value in 2008, falling from $7.7 billion to $5.7 billion. It bottomed out at $5.3 billion (2009 and 2010) before posting gains along with the company. At the end of 2012, endowment assets totaled $7.4 billion.

Now the foundation is looking to cash in on the recovery, as officials contemplate selling as much as $500 million in stock in 2014, “with the amount subject to change as the year progresses,” according to a statement released Monday.

Click here for more IBJ coverage of Lilly Endowment and its grant-making activities.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT