IBJNews

Lilly gets boost in Alzheimer's race

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. got a boost of confidence last week that its project to launch the first effective Alzheimer’s treatment is on the right track—though it still faces hugely long odds.

A study published July 11 in the journal Nature gave strong support to the theory that Alzheimer’s is caused by the buildup of plaques in the brain made up of a protein called beta amyloid.

Lilly’s experimental drug solanezumab binds to amyloid and removes it from the brain. The Indianapolis-based drugmaker hopes the reduction of amyloid levels stops or even reverses the progress of Alzheimer’s.

That's a common theory to explain Alzheimer's, but it's not the only one. In the 1990s, researchers noticed that the accumulation of another protein, called tau, tracked more closely with a patient's mental decline than did amyloid.

Alzheimer's disease slowly saps the brain’s memory and eventually its ability to make the body perform the most basic tasks. The World Health Organization estimates that 18 million people worldwide suffer from Alzheimer’s, with that number expected to hit 34 million by 2025.

Such a massive unmet need is why Wall Street analysts think the first effective Alzheimer’s treatment could garner as much as $10 billion in annual sales.

Racing Lilly to launch the first successful drug are New York-based Pfizer Inc., New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson and Ireland-based Elan Corp. They could announce clinical results of their drug bapineuzumab, which is also designed to reduce amyloid in the brain, as early as August but perhaps not until October.

Indianapolis-based Lilly is expected to release results from two Phase 3 trials of solanezumab this fall. A negative outcome could send Lilly’s already sluggish shares down another 10 percent, according to ISI Group analyst Mark Schoenebaum. But an unqualified success could spike Lilly shares 50 percent.

"It would be the single-biggest-day pharma stock move I'd ever seen," Schoenebaum told The Wall Street Journal. Schonebaum gives solanebzumab a 15-percent chance of success. Other Wall Street analysts give it a 1-in-10 shot.

Lilly shares have risen 2 percent since the Nature study was published, trading as high as $43.71 on Monday. The study showed that a rare gene mutation discovered in Icelanders protected their brains from the buildup of amyloid plaques—and from the onset of Alzheimer’s. The gene mutation even appeared to override another genetic mutation that is a strong risk factor for Alzheimer’s.

Richard Mohs, head of Lilly’s early clinical development in neurosciences, was quoted in The New York Times as saying he was “very encouraged by these study results.” Mohs added that developing drugs to combat amyloid is “a logical path for the development of effective therapies that may slow disease progression."

Still, one big challenge for Lilly and other companies developing drugs to combat amyloid is that the buildup of the plaques and the damage they cause appear to start two decades before any dementia sets in, according to a new study in The New England Journal of Medicine.

That means that the more than 2,000 patients in Lilly’s ongoing trials of solanezumab might be too far gone for a drug to help them now. The Nature study of Icelanders shows only that having a genetic protection against amyloid for one’s entire life spares a person from Alzheimer’s.

Lilly’s challenge is to show that 18 months or less of amyloid-reducing treatment can also make a difference.

Identifying patients earlier led Lilly to acquire and commercialize Amyvid, an imaging agent that helps make amyloid plaques visible in brain scans of living patients. Before, the plaques could be identified only during autopsies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT