IBJNews

Lilly gets dinged for job cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. got called out in a recent report on companies that took advantage of the 2004 tax holiday on foreign profits and have since slashed jobs.

The 2004 tax holiday was supposed to induce big companies—particularly those in research and development fields—to hire more Americans. Of the 843 companies that took advantage of the tax holiday, the liberal think tank Institute for Policy Studies identified only 56 that have since reduced their global work forces.

Lilly is among those companies the Washington, D.C.-based organizations labels “job killers.” The Indianapolis-based drugmaker repatriated $8 billion in foreign profits in 2004, having them taxed at a 5-percent rate instead of the 35 percent it would have paid without the holiday.

That same year, Lilly hit its peak employment of more than 46,000 global workers. But from the end of 2004 to the end of 2010, Lilly eliminated 6,150 jobs, according to the institute, which culled figures from companies’ annual reports.

Lilly actually cut 6,350 jobs in the United States, according to the institute’s figures, while adding 200 in foreign markets.

“This study of corporate beneficiaries of the 2004 tax holiday reveals that these companies not only failed to create long-term, stable jobs, but were huge job destroyers,” institute staff members wrote in an executive summary of the report. The institute is arguing against legislation currently pending in Congress that would institute a new tax holiday on the repatriation of foreign profits.

Of course, the institute ignores the financial crisis and recession of 2008-2009, which prompted some of the biggest job cuts. While Lilly was one of 13 companies the institute could identify as having cut U.S. jobs from 2004 to 2006, the company’s biggest cuts have come since September 2009, when Lilly announced 5,500 layoffs.

Those cuts were also prompted not by Lilly’s poor business results—the company is making more money than ever—but by the cutoff in revenue that will begin this month when its best-selling drug Zyprexa loses its patent protection in the United States and Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT