IBJNews

Lilly makes $300M deal for Philadelphia drug company

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. has agreed to pay $300 million to acquire the maker of an experimental imaging agent that could help identify patients with Alzheimer's disease, the companies announced Monday morning.

The closely held company, Philadelphia-based Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Inc., is developing an agent that would identify amyloid plaque in the brain. The leading theory about Alzheimer's is that amyloid proteins build up into plaques, disrupting brain functions and leading to the memory loss characteristic of the disease.

Avid's imaging agent, called florbetapir, is currently in Phase 3 clinical trials, and Lilly officials said they see the agent as a good revenue generator in its own right, as nearly every major pharmaceutical company and many academic researchers are chasing advances in the currently untreatable disease.

Lilly Ventures, the venture capital arm of Lilly, has held a stake in Avid since 2005. And since 2007, the two companies have been collaborating on clinical trials of Lilly drugs.

Indianapolis-based Lilly has an experimental drug, solanezumab, in Phase 3 trials that aims to draw amyloid proteins away from the brain by binding to it in the bloodstream.

According to the acquisition agreement, Lilly could pay as much as $500 million more to Avid shareholders if florbetapir reaches the market and achieves certain commercial goals.

Early detection is critical for any drug to have a chance of halting or reversing the impacts of the disease. That's where Avid's imaging compound could help.

A successful treatment for Alzheimer's could achieve more than $5 billion a year in sales, according to Wall Street analysts.

"The acquisition of Avid Radiopharmaceuticals aligns well with Lilly's innovation-based strategy, offers a potential near-term revenue opportunity, leverages our neuroscience expertise and will immediately bolster our diagnostics capabilities," said Lilly CEO John Lechleiter in a prepared statement.

Lilly needs new sources of revenue because beginning this month and running till 2013, it will lose U.S. patent protection on drugs that account for nearly half its annual sales.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT