IBJNews

Lilly pays $224,000 to area doctors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

It’s no secret that Eli Lilly and Co. is the biggest private employer in the Indianapolis area.

But Lilly also supplements the incomes of a few dozen local doctors — to the tune of more than $224,000 in just the first quarter. Lilly pays the doctors and other health professionals to help its marketing teams and to speak to other doctors on how a Lilly medicine works.

Bojrab


Extrapolated for the entire year, those payments — made to 53 doctors and health professionals — would total $896,700, although first-quarter payments tend to be higher than during the rest of the year.

Nationwide, the list included nearly 3,400 health care providers and more than $20 million in payments.

The biggest local recipient was Carmel psychiatrist Dr. Chris Bojrab. He garnered $39,150 for his consulting and speaking about Cymbalta, an antidepressant and pain medication that is Lilly’s second-best-selling drug.

Bojrab said he devoted about 20 full days of work to Lilly, including travel to locations like San Diego and Jacksonville, Fla., to help train other physicians to give presentations in their local areas.

“We’re certainly well-compensated for what we do,” Bojrab said of physicians who consult and speak for drug companies. He also speaks and consults for six other drug companies, including New York-based Pfizer Inc. and Japan-based Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

He estimated the pay is about 20 percent higher than what he could earn if he just spent the time seeing patients. But he also has to spend a lot of time coordinating his travel schedules and catching up on work he missed while away.

“It’s not uncommon for me to come home and spend three or four hours a night, just to work out the travel details,” he said, adding, “And it’s not like the work that you had to do goes away.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT