IBJNews

Lilly raises forecast after beating third-quarter profit estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Third-quarter profit at Eli Lilly and Co. topped Wall Street estimates on strong international  sales, and the company raised its profit forecast for the year.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker earned $1.3 billion in the quarter ended Sept. 30, up 38 percent from the same period last year. Excluding extraordinary items from a year ago, Lilly’s profit was up 2 percent.

Lilly earned $1.18 per share—or $1.21 excluding special charges—beating analyst estimates of $1.15 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

Lilly’s revenue for the quarter also rose 2 percent, to $5.65 billion. However, analysts expected revenue of $5.79 billion.

The company said its slower-than-expected revenue growth turned into higher-than-expected profits because of its cost-containment measures, which have included mass layoffs in the last year. Also, the company said new rules issued about the health reform law passed this year in the United States suggest the law will have less of an impact than previously thought.

"Japan performed particularly well in the quarter, growing revenue by 27 percent, driven by recent product launches. Strong performance was also seen in key emerging market countries, including China,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a statement. “Based upon our strong worldwide year-to-date results and lower estimates of the impact of U.S. health care reform, we have once again raised our earnings guidance for the year."

Lilly raised its full-year profit forecast for a second time this year. It now expects to earn $4.55 to $4.65 per share, up from a range of $4.44 to $4.59 per share predicted in July.

However, Lilly’s record profits continue to be overshadowed by its setbacks on bringing new drugs to market.

On Tuesday night, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered a study of heart risks of Bydureon, a once-weekly version of the diabetes medicine Byetta that Lilly and two partners companies were hoping to bring to market shotly. Now they face a delay of at least 20 months. That announcement caused Moody’s Investor Service to consider downgrading its rating of Lilly’s bonds and financial strength.

Then on Wednesday night, Lilly and a development partner announced that an experimental drug to treat Type I diabetes failed to improve patients’ blood sugar levels. They are halting the Phase 3 clinical trial of the drug, known as tepluzimab.

Lechleiter showed no signs of swerving from Lilly’s strategy of bringing new drugs to market, rather than doing a merger to help absorb revenue losses from its looming patent expirations.

"Although we are disappointed by recent pipeline setbacks, we remain committed to our strategy of accelerating the flow of innovative new medicines that provide improved outcomes for individual patients,” he said in a statement. “We believe that this strategy, while not without risk, will provide the greatest value to our shareholders and the patients we serve."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT