IBJNews

Lilly's quarterly profit falls, but tops analyst expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. reported a second-quarter profit that was better than analysts estimated after higher sales for the antidepressant Cymbalta helped trim losses from generic competition to its former top-seller, Zyprexa.

Earnings declined 23 percent, to $924 million, or 83 cents a share, Indianapolis-based Lilly said Wednesday. Profit excluding one-time items beat by 6 cents the average of 15 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

“If you take Zyprexa out of the equation, our underlying sales grew 8 percent,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a telephone interview after the earnings announcement.

Cheaper copies of the schizophrenia therapy Zyprexa came on the market last year, and exclusivity ends in 2013 for Cymbalta, now the company’s best-seller. Lilly is counting on a pipeline of experimental drugs, including the osteoporosis treatment Forteo and blood-thinner Effient, to help fuel sales after 2014, and is reining in expenses to help expand margins.

“Lilly has, for the first time, guided to operating margin expansion post-2014, and the magnitude is impressive,” wrote Mark Schoenebaum, a New York-based analyst with ISI Group, in a note to clients Wednesday.

Revenue overall dropped 10 percent, to $5.6 billion, Lilly reported.

Adjusted profit for the full year will be in the range of $3.30 to $3.40 a share, up from a previous forecast of $3.15 to $3.30. The company also said it plans to bring research and development costs to 18 percent to 20 percent of revenue after 2014, and reduce selling general and administrative expenses to 28 percent to 30 percent of revenue.

“Taken together, the company now is effectively guiding operating margin improvement of 7 percent to 11 percent, which would be in-line with” industry peers, Schoenebaum wrote.

Lilly shares rose 2.5 percent, to $43.02 each, in mid-morning trading Wednesday. That followed Tuesday's fall of 4.2 percent after competitors reported poor test results for an Alzheimer's treatment similar to one Lilly is developing.

The dollar’s strength against other currencies reduced quarterly sales by about 2 percentage points for the company, which gets at least half of its revenue from outside the United States. The U.S. dollar index, which reflects the value of the dollar against major world currencies, was on average 8.1 percent higher in the second quarter than a year earlier.

Sales of Cymbalta helped make up for some of the drop in revenue from Zyprexa. Cymbalta revenue increased 22 percent, to $1.22 billion, while Zyprexa fell 73 percent, to $380 million.

Revenue for Lilly’s animal health business rose 32 percent, to $512 million.

Lechleiter pointed to Forteo, Effient and cancer therapy Alimta as other sources of growth. He also cited the animal health business and sales opportunities in Japan and China.

“These were areas we invested in in advance of our YZ period,” he said, referring to the years of patent expirations. “Knowing they could be sources of growth that could cushion the blow we took when we faced generic competition for Zyprexa.”

Investors are also shifting attention to Lilly’s new Alzheimer’s treatment, which the company is expected to report initial data by the end of September, said Jami Rubin, an analyst with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York.

“We expect the key focus to remain on Lilly’s high-risk, high-reward Alzheimer’s drug solanezumab and potential mitigating factors if unsuccessful, such as a program to cut costs,” Rubin said in a report before the earnings release.

Lilly shares fell Tuesday after Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Elan Corp. reported data July 23 showing a similar experimental Alzheimer’s treatment failed in the first of four late-stage clinical trials.

Lechleiter said conclusions on Lilly’s Alzheimer’s medicine shouldn’t be drawn from those results.

“They’re different from one another,” he said. “We just need to wait and see our own data.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT