IBJNews

Lilly's quarterly profit falls, but tops analyst expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. reported a second-quarter profit that was better than analysts estimated after higher sales for the antidepressant Cymbalta helped trim losses from generic competition to its former top-seller, Zyprexa.

Earnings declined 23 percent, to $924 million, or 83 cents a share, Indianapolis-based Lilly said Wednesday. Profit excluding one-time items beat by 6 cents the average of 15 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

“If you take Zyprexa out of the equation, our underlying sales grew 8 percent,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a telephone interview after the earnings announcement.

Cheaper copies of the schizophrenia therapy Zyprexa came on the market last year, and exclusivity ends in 2013 for Cymbalta, now the company’s best-seller. Lilly is counting on a pipeline of experimental drugs, including the osteoporosis treatment Forteo and blood-thinner Effient, to help fuel sales after 2014, and is reining in expenses to help expand margins.

“Lilly has, for the first time, guided to operating margin expansion post-2014, and the magnitude is impressive,” wrote Mark Schoenebaum, a New York-based analyst with ISI Group, in a note to clients Wednesday.

Revenue overall dropped 10 percent, to $5.6 billion, Lilly reported.

Adjusted profit for the full year will be in the range of $3.30 to $3.40 a share, up from a previous forecast of $3.15 to $3.30. The company also said it plans to bring research and development costs to 18 percent to 20 percent of revenue after 2014, and reduce selling general and administrative expenses to 28 percent to 30 percent of revenue.

“Taken together, the company now is effectively guiding operating margin improvement of 7 percent to 11 percent, which would be in-line with” industry peers, Schoenebaum wrote.

Lilly shares rose 2.5 percent, to $43.02 each, in mid-morning trading Wednesday. That followed Tuesday's fall of 4.2 percent after competitors reported poor test results for an Alzheimer's treatment similar to one Lilly is developing.

The dollar’s strength against other currencies reduced quarterly sales by about 2 percentage points for the company, which gets at least half of its revenue from outside the United States. The U.S. dollar index, which reflects the value of the dollar against major world currencies, was on average 8.1 percent higher in the second quarter than a year earlier.

Sales of Cymbalta helped make up for some of the drop in revenue from Zyprexa. Cymbalta revenue increased 22 percent, to $1.22 billion, while Zyprexa fell 73 percent, to $380 million.

Revenue for Lilly’s animal health business rose 32 percent, to $512 million.

Lechleiter pointed to Forteo, Effient and cancer therapy Alimta as other sources of growth. He also cited the animal health business and sales opportunities in Japan and China.

“These were areas we invested in in advance of our YZ period,” he said, referring to the years of patent expirations. “Knowing they could be sources of growth that could cushion the blow we took when we faced generic competition for Zyprexa.”

Investors are also shifting attention to Lilly’s new Alzheimer’s treatment, which the company is expected to report initial data by the end of September, said Jami Rubin, an analyst with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York.

“We expect the key focus to remain on Lilly’s high-risk, high-reward Alzheimer’s drug solanezumab and potential mitigating factors if unsuccessful, such as a program to cut costs,” Rubin said in a report before the earnings release.

Lilly shares fell Tuesday after Pfizer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Elan Corp. reported data July 23 showing a similar experimental Alzheimer’s treatment failed in the first of four late-stage clinical trials.

Lechleiter said conclusions on Lilly’s Alzheimer’s medicine shouldn’t be drawn from those results.

“They’re different from one another,” he said. “We just need to wait and see our own data.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT