Lilly settles Zyprexa marketing suit for $1.4 billion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co.'s guilty plea for improper marketing of Zyprexa is its second such plea in just over three years.

Indianapolis-based Lilly pleaded guilty to one violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act on Thursday and agreed to pay $1.42 billion to settle both that criminal charge as well as civil lawsuits in which it did not admit wrongdoing.

Lilly made a similar plea in December 2005 for improperly marketing its osteoporosis drug Evista in 1998 as a treatment for breast cancer. Since the settlement, in which Lilly paid $36 million, Lilly has obtained regulatory approval for Evista to treat breast cancer.

"Since that time, Lilly has taken a number of steps to build toward an industry-leading compliance program," said Lilly spokeswoman Angela Sekston.
As part of the settlement, Lilly entered into a corporate-integrity pact. Sekston added that the company has already been doing most of the actions called for in the corporate-integrity pact signed as part of the Zyprexa settlement.

Lilly has cooperated with the Justice Department's investigation since it began in 2004. The investigation also included accusations that Lilly improperly marketed Zyprexa for use in the elderly and children, and that it did so over multiple years.

However, Lilly pleaded guilty only to improperly marketing Zyprexa to elderly patients as treatment for dementia, including Alzheimer's, from September 1999 to March 2001. For this action, Lilly agreed to pay $615 million.

The rest of the settlement money will go to resolve a series of civil lawsuits brought by the Medicaid programs of the federal governments and multiple states. These suits claimed that Lilly defrauded the health program for the poor by boosting the use of Zyprexa with improper marketing.

Lilly again denied those allegations, but agreed to settle the cases without admitting wrongdoing.

The corporate-integrity agreement Lilly entered into will last five years and will include an independent third-party review organization to assess and report on Lilly's systems, processes, policies, procedures and practices.

"Every day and with every interaction we strive to operate in a responsible and compliant manner. Doing the right thing is non-negotiable at Lilly, and I remain personally committed to all of us at Lilly maintaining the highest standards of conduct," said Lilly CEO John C. Lechleiter, in a statement.

Lilly already took a charge of $1.415 billion, or $1.29 per share, in the third quarter of 2008 in anticipation of today's settlement.

In previous settlements, Lilly has paid $62 million to 32 states to settle product-liability claims about Zyprexa. Thirteen other states have sued Lilly for both product liability and Medicaid fraud related to Zyprexa. Twelve of those suits are still outstanding after Lilly settled with Alaska last year for $15 million.

Thousands of individuals have sued Lilly over Zyprexa, claiming it caused weight gain and even diabetes. Lilly has set aside $1.2 billion to settle 32,000 individual cases. Another 125 remain.

Also outstanding are suits brought by insurance companies, labor unions and pension funds. The judge in that case, Jack Weinstein, certified it as a class action in September and recommended that Lilly settle.

Zyprexa is Lilly's bestselling drug. In 2007, it recorded $4.8 billion in global sales. After the settlement news, Lilly's share price fell 70 cents in morning trading, or 1.87 percent.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.