IBJNews

Lilly shares rise on Alzheimer's study results

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co.’s experimental Alzheimer’s drug slowed cognitive decline 34 percent in patients with mild forms of the disease, according to an analysis of Lilly’s clinical trial data by a group of academic researchers released Monday.

The magnitude of the impact fits what some physicians have said would be meaningful to patients, but Indianapolis-based Lilly still isn’t saying whether it will file for approval of the drug, called solanezumab, or instead conduct another clinical trial.

Lilly’s share price gained more than 5 percent on the news, closing Monday at $50.78.

The stock already had risen nearly 14 percent since Aug. 24, when Lilly first announced that the drug had shown some positive effects. If successful, solanezumab would be the first effective treatment for Alzheimer’s disease on the market, and could bring Lilly $5 billion to $10 billion in annual revenue.
 
“While the path forward has not been determined, we believe these data in patients with mild disease may provide a step toward a potential treatment option,” Dave Ricks, president of Lilly’s Bio-Medicines business unit, said in a prepared statement.

The drug attempts to fight Alzheimer’s disease by binding to the protein amyloid and carrying it out of patients’ brains. The build-up and clumping of excess amyloid proteins is believed to cause Alzheimer’s disease.

Lilly’s two Phase 3 clinical trials of solanezumab failed their primary goal, which was to reduce decline in the ability of both mild and moderate Alzheimer’s patient to think and do daily activities.

But in mild patients, solanezumab appeared to have some effect. In the first of the two clinical trials, solanezumab slowed cognitive decline 42 percent. But it had no effect on patients' ability to do daily activities.

In the second clinical trial, solanezumab slowed patients’ mental decline about 20 percent and their functional decline about 19 percent. However, neither result was statistically significant.

When data from both trials were pooled, the reduction in cognitive decline for mild Alzheimer’s patients was 34 percent, according to a statement released by Lilly. The improvement in daily activities was 17 percent, which was not statistically significant.

Solanezumab also showed an effect on some, but not all, so-called biomarkers, which are measurements of protein levels in patients' blood or spinal fluid. Lilly said it would present more information on the biomarker results at future medical meetings.

The data were produced by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, a consortium of academic Alzheiemer’s researchers from around the country.

“The data results from the solanezumab Phase 3 trials were encouraging to the ADCS team,” said Dr. Rachelle Doody, a professor of neurology at the Baylor College of Medicine who presented the results Monday at a meeting of the American Neurological Association in Boston. “These results represent an important step for the medical, academic, and scientific communities in understanding brain amyloid as a target of A.D. therapies."

Dr. Martin Farlow, the associate co-director of the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center at the Indiana University School of Medicine, said in August interview that an effective Alzheimer’s drug would need to slow patient’s decline 30 percent to 50 percent. He participated in the clinical trials of solanezumab.

“There has to be a derivable clinical benefit that’s demonstrated,” Farlow said before Lilly first released its clinical trial results for solanezumab in August. “It’s very possible that one or more of these studies may demonstrate effects that sort of point the way to the next step.”

Recent research has shown that Alzheimer’s disease begins to damage patients’ brains 10 to 20 years before they can be diagnosed with the disease. As a result, many expect Lilly will need to study solanezumab in a new clinical trial aimed at patients with pre-Alzheimer’s conditions, such as mild cognitive impairment.

Lilly officials said Monday they would continue to discuss the data from the trials of solanezumab to decide whether to file for market approval or to conduct another clinical trial.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT