IBJNews

Lilly shares rise after drugmaker reports solid second quarter

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. shares jumped 2.6 percent Wednesday morning after the drug maker reported better-than-expect results for the second quarter.

Strong sales and penny-pinching helped Lilly beat Wall Street’s expectations in the quarter, leading the company to raise its profit forecast for the year.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker reported earnings of $1.2 billion in the three months ended June 30, an increase of 31 percent compared with same quarter last year. Earnings per share totaled $1.11, compared with 83 cents a year ago.

Excluding a restructuring charge of $63.5 million from the closing of a plant in Germany, Lilly would have earned $1.16 per share. On that basis, analysts were expecting earnings of $1 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial.

Because it outperformed those expectations, Lilly hiked up its profit expectations for the year by a range of 13 cent to 18 cents per share. The company now expects to earn between $4.28 and $4.38 for the year.

In the second quarter, Lilly was able to boost its sales 6 percent worldwide to $5.9 billion. Analysts were expecting revenue of $5.82 billion.

"Continued operating and financial discipline, along with a maturing pipeline of potential new medicines, gives me great confidence in the company's ability to meet the challenges we face from upcoming patent expirations and to resume growth after 2014,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a prepared statement.

Lechleiter took a leave of absence on May 13 to have surgery on a dilated aoarta. He returned on July 8.

 “It looks like they were doing some pretty good work while I was gone,” Lechleiter said.

Lilly’s bestselling drug, the antidepressant Cymbalta, is set to lose its U.S. patent protection in December, after which its sales will switch to cheaper generics. Sales of Cymbalta grew 22 percent in the second quarter, to nearly $1.5 billion.

Lilly already lost patent protection on its former bestseller, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, in late 2011. And Lilly also will lose patent protection on Evista, an osteoporosis drug, next year. Lilly is hoping to win approval on new diabetes and cancer drugs to offset those coming hits to its sales.

The company has cut costs to help fund its drive for new drugs, and last week said it would freeze wages for most of its workers.

“Management appears to be showing prudent cost discipline in anticipation of the Cymbalta patent cliff,” Mark Schoenebaum, an analyst with International Strategy & Investment Group in New York said in a report. “Smart expense control should increase the street’s confidence that Lilly is serious about dramatically improving operating margins post-2014.”

Lilly expects a 20-percent reduction in revenue in 2014 because of the U.S. expiration of the Cymbalta and Evista patents, a company spokesman said July 17. Lilly had hoped to avoid more cost cuts in the medium term, Lechleiter said.

“We’re losing a lot of revenue when at the same time we’ve got to launch our phase III products,” he said.

“You don’t take these actions lightly. This is the second such announcement in three years,” Lechleiter said of the wage freeze.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT