IBJNews

Lilly stops development on cancer drug after failed study

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. halted development of an experimental cancer drug after the medicine failed to lengthen survival for certain lymphoma patients in a study.

The decision will result in a charge of $30 million in the second quarter, Indianapolis-based Lilly said in a statement Friday. The drug, enzastaurin, was in the most advanced stage of testing and had been expected to generate $260 million in annual sales by 2018, according to Mark Schoenebaum, an analyst with ISI Group.

Lilly said in April it was expecting to seek U.S. regulatory approval this year for the drug to prevent the relapse of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, a type of blood cancer. The setback leaves Lilly with four treatments it may be able to bring to market next year. The company needs new drugs to help offset the loss of patent protection later this year on its top-selling product, Cymbalta for depression.

“We are disappointed in the results that we’re announcing today,” said Richard Gaynor, vice president of product development and medical affairs for Lilly’s cancer unit, in the statement. “However, our oncology pipeline is still one of the most robust across the industry.”

Lilly shares were up 20 cents early Friday, to $54.76 each. The stock had gained 32 percent in the 12 months through Thursday.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT