IBJNews

Lilly aims to submit five new drugs for approval

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

With Eli Lilly and Co. set to see patents expire on its best-selling drug at year’s end, it is in the company’s interest to say its pipeline is about to produce new drugs. But the Indianapolis drugmaker may be in a position to submit five new drugs for regulatory approval this year.

Lilly will lose patent protection in western markets for the antidepressant Cymbalta at the end of 2013, which will wipe out most of that drug’s $5 billion in annual sales. That hurts because Lilly is already reeling from the late 2011 patent expirations on its antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, also a $5-billion-a-year blockbuster.

Lilly said it will submit its drug ramucirumab, for the treatment of gastric cancer, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency this year—even before waiting for results from another Phase 3 clinical trial.

That decision surprised some analysts, who noted that ramucirumab clinical trials so far have shown that the drug extends patients’ lives for just 1.4 months, on average, even though it also extends the time they live without further progression of gastric cancer.

Goldman Sachs analyst Jami Rubin called the drug’s overall survival data “underwhelming.” And Alex Arfaei, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said he’s “cautious” about the prospect of the FDA's approving the drug before seeing results of a second Phase 3 trial.

Still, with Lilly testing ramucirumab, which goes by the nickname RAM, in a total of five cancers, bullish analysts think the drug could grow to more than $3 billion in annual sales.

“It is scientifically plausible that ramucirumab may show a much superior profile compared with Roche’s Avastin in breast and gastric cancer,” wrote Citigroup analyst Andrew Baum in a Jan. 30 research note.

Lilly also might submit ramucirumab for approval to treat breast cancer this year, after it sees results of yet another Phase 3 trial it has under way.

Also, Lilly hopes to submit enzastaurin, a drug designed to treat lymphoma, for market approval this year.

Referring to Lilly by its ticker symbol and speaking of the company’s net present value, Barclays Capital analyst Tony Butler wrote, “LLY’s oncology pipeline assets currently make up approximately 3-5% of total company NPV but could stand to comprise nearly 15-18% of FY20 revenues.”

The other three drugs Lilly hopes to submit for market approval this year are all aimed at Type 2 diabetes: dulaglutide, empagliflozin and a long-lasting insulin called insulin glargine.

“In 2013, we could see up to five regulatory filings,” said Derica Rice, Lilly’s chief financial officer, in a Jan. 29 conference call with analysts. Noting that Lilly has 13 drugs in Phase 3 testing and another 23 in Phase 2 testing, Rice added, “This is the most robust mid- to late-stage pipeline in our history, and it positions us to drive growth post-2014.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT