IBJNews

Lilly warehouse thieves had security report, lawsuit says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal lawsuit alleges that thieves who broke into an Eli Lilly and Co. warehouse in Connecticut three years ago and stole more than $60 million worth of drugs obtained a copy of a report that revealed weaknesses in the building's security system.

Eli Lilly insurer National Union Fire Insurance Co. sued ADT Security Services this month in federal court in Connecticut. ADT had created a report before the March 2010 break-in detailing weaknesses in the warehouse's security system, The Indianapolis Star reported.

The suit seeks $42 million in damages — the amount of the Indianapolis-based drug maker's insurance claim — from ADT, whose corporate security business is now run by Tyco Integrated Security.

The suit says the security report allowed two brothers indicted in the theft to know the warehouse's placement of every security camera, motion detector and glass-break sensor.

National Union claims the thieves used the security report to "infiltrate the warehouse without triggering the security monitoring system," the lawsuit says. The thieves knew where to cut through the roof to avoid security detectors and which parts of the warehouse and loading bays weren't seen by surveillance cameras.

The lawsuit does not speculate on how the thieves obtained the security report or provide any proof they had it.

A National Union attorney declined to discuss the lawsuit while it's pending.

Tyco spokesman Brett Ludwig also said he could not comment on pending litigation but said the company "take(s) very, very stringent and solid precautions to safeguard all our customer information." Lilly is still a client of Tyco.

Lilly spokesman Greg Kueterman told the Star the company "recognize(s) the right of the insurer to pursue this litigation," but that it has "no other stake in the lawsuit."

Amaury and Amed Villa, who lived in Miami, are currently awaiting trial in Connecticut. The FBI arrested them in 2012.

Authorities said fingerprints left on water bottles inside the Lilly warehouse led them to the brothers. A lawyer for Amaury Villa said that before the lawsuit, she'd never heard of the allegations that Villa had access to the warehouse's security report.

"I have extensive knowledge about that case," Maria Elena Perez told the Star. "I don't know where that allegation comes from. It's never been alleged by the government."
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT