Lilly wins approval for long-acting Zyprexa

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. won approval from U.S. regulators for a long-acting, injectable form of its bestselling antipsychotic Zyprexa, the company announced Monday morning.

Zyprexa Relprevv, when injected into a patient’s muscles, lasts up to four weeks. The U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration OK’d the long-acting version to treat schizophrenia.

The drug could bring some much-needed profit to Lilly. The Indianapolis-based drugmaker will lose most of the $4.7 billion a year Zyprexa now generates in revenue when cheaper generic versions of the drug hit the market two years from now.

But the long-acting version of Zyprexa has patents that could run until 2018. Analysts have been predicting no more than modest revenue from the new version, since the FDA had previously declined to approve the drug over concerns about its side effects.

But it could be significant if Lilly can duplicate the success competitor New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson has had with its injectable schizophrenia drug Risperdal Consta. The drug has achieved sales of $1.3 billion a year after many patients who were taking Risperdal pills switched over to the longer-acting version.

Long-acting medicines for schizophrenics are beneficial because many patients don’t remember to take a pill each day and caregivers can struggle to administer the medicine on a daily basis.

"There is a growing recognition among psychiatrists in the United States that non-adherence to medication is an even greater barrier to care for patients with schizophrenia than was previously understood, and that long-acting treatments can play a beneficial  role in helping patients maintain a stable treatment regimen," said Dr. John Hayes, vice president of Lilly Research Laboratories, in a prepared statement.

The FDA initially said it could not approve long-acting Zyprexa because of concerns about it causing excessive sleepiness in some patients. But Lilly worked with the FDA to develop a mandatory patient care program, which restricts distribution of Zyprexa Realprevv to medical professionals or patients enrolled in the program.


  • crazy
    ...just the answer to Indiana's economic woes, in addition to more gambling and corporate pig 'production' (seems appropriate for Richy Mitch Daniels' idea of 'economic development' which is a HUGE load of manure!) we need to produce more anti-depressant and and anti-psychotic medications than ANYONE else in the world, yeah! Enjoy the distractions on your flat screen TVs while the world slowly circles the drain...insanity ain't really that bad if you're completely unconscious to it!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.