IBJNews

Lilly's Alimta get favorable opinion for new use in Europe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co., looking for every extra dollar it can get before watching its bestselling drug's patents expire next month, might get more sales out of its $2.2 billion-a-year lung cancer drug Alimta.

A committee at the European Medicines Agency issued a positive opinion for the use of Alimta as a "continuation" maintenance therapy, Lilly announced Monday. That makes market approval by the European Commission more likely.

Continuation maintenance approval could mean significantly more dollars for Lilly. It would allow doctors to treat lung cancer patients with Alimta during initial treatment and for numerous months afterward to keep the disease in check.

Alimta already was approved as a maintenance drug, but only for use after initial treatment of the disease with other drugs.

Receiving approval as a maintenance therapy, which Alimta won back in 2009, helped sales soar 66 percent since then. Alimta sales totaled $1.2 billion worldwide in the first half of 2011.

Alimta already has been growing rapidly in foreign markets, with sales rising more than 17 percent from the first half of 2010 to the first half of this year.

According to Lilly, no chemotherapy is currently approved as a continuation maintenance drug.

"Lung cancer is one of the most difficult cancers to treat, and new therapy options are much needed," said Dr. Allen Melemed, Lilly’s senior medical director for Alimta.

Alimta is designed to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have a certain tumor type called nonsquamous. The opinion of the committee at the European Medicine Agency was based on a clinical trial, the results of which were presented publicly in June. The trial treated patients with a combination of Alimta and cisplatin, a standard chemotherapy for lung cancer, and then those who did not improve received maintenance doses of Alimta.

Lilly’s U.S. and European patents on its bestseller Zyprexa will expire in October, allowing cheaper generic copies to sap most of the antipsychotic’s $5 billion per year in sales.

Zyprexa will be the second of five Lilly blockbusters to lose patent protection between 2010 and 2014, and the company has not been able to launch new drugs with strong enough sales to replace that revenue.

So Lilly leaders have looked to winning extra indications for its existing drugs, such as Alimta, while also growing its businesses in animal health and emerging markets. It hopes those efforts produce enough revenue to give its research and development team time to launch new drugs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "And the success of the Indiana GOP to not allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes? Fixed that for you; editorial bias rebalanced. Seriously, there are so many things wrong with Obamacare that the only way one can view it as a success is to assume that it was designed to fail our way into a government single payor healthcare system. The system is complex, creates huge regulatory burdens and overhead and yet still does not have adequate means to control escalating health care costs. But then when you elect a 10th grade math drop out with no quantitative reasoning skills to be President of one of the world's most important economies in troubled times, you can't really be surprised by blatant stupidity.

  2. No NIMBYs here to chase off a decent development. We don't need tons of parking and we'd happily play the role of host to a downtown Whole Foods.

  3. Whatever you do, don't change a single thing about Broad Ripple. I want it to look just like it did in the late '70s, with 30% of the north side of Broad Ripple Avenue burned out and plenty of places to park. That's right Broad Ripple, NEVER CHANGE. Let the world pass you by, don't improve your empty, abandoned lots full of weeds. Someday someone will want to film a zombie movie here.

  4. Hollywood could step in and make a movie about the history about this forlorn series. It could be a full celebrity cast of characters. WOW. http://www.advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2013/02/indiana-taxpayers-forced-to-pay-for.html

  5. This shouldn't come as a shock to many. Austin is a great city, and Indy needs to take some notes. Austin invests in decent transit options, has a highly educated workforce, embraces a creative class, and --despite being the state capital-- is not micromanaged by rural and suburban legislators. Want Indy to grow? Invest in the city (i.e. spend money). Raise taxes a bit, and use the money to improve education. And keep the state legislature out of Indy the other 9 months of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT