IBJNews

Lilly's insulin dip concerns analysts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. suffered a tough week on the stock market, in part because of a disturbing bit of news buried in its third-quarter earnings report: Lilly’s insulin sales are down.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker is relying heavily on sustaining $3.5 billion in annual sales of its Humulin and Humalog insulins to carry it through its current string of patent expirations on other drugs—at least until it can launch new drugs to pick up the slack.

But in the third quarter, sales of Humalog fell 3 percent and sales of Humulin fell 5 percent, compared with the same quarter a year ago. Lilly officials said they lost share in the insulin market in the first half of the year, although the situation has stabilized now.

Still, those problems sparked a lot of questions from Wall Street analysts during a conference call Oct. 24. And Lilly’s share price slipped 3 percent from its close on Oct. 23 until the end of the week. The stock closed Friday at $50.26 per share.

“The Humalog and Humulin sales were light relative to our expectations,” noted Goldman Sachs analyst Jami Rubin during the conference call with Lilly executives. She added, “Insulin scripts have been strong. So what’s happening with the pricing environment?”

Both Humalog and Humulin suffered because they were removed from the formulary of a large third-party payer this year, Lilly reported. Also, the contract between Lilly and Wal-Mart to use Humulin for Wal-Mart’s ReliOn brand was terminated.

But in addition to those things, Lilly officials said, third-party payers are more aggressively threatening to remove or de-emphasize each drugmaker’s insulins from their formularies if the drugmakers don’t offer better prices.

“The negotiations that we basically have with some of the major payers are more difficult. And we have seen their leverage increase as they have the ability to be able to move share as they restrict access to products given the contracts that they're able to establish,” said Enrique Conterno, president of Lilly’s diabetes unit. “So, yes, there is some pressure.”

And in addition to that, doctors are prescribing insulin later to diabetics because they first try to control blood sugar with a relatively new class of oral medicines called DPP-4s, such as Januvia and Tradjenta, and through injectible medicines known as GLP-1s, such as Byetta, Bydureon and Victoza.

“To some extent, that is delaying the initiation on insulin and some of the earlier use of insulin,” Conterno said. “We believe that some of these impacts are more short term. I think we saw similar impacts when, for example, metformin was introduced in the U.S. many years ago. So my sense is that we will continue to see long-term insulin growth rates that are much more aligned with historical rates. But we are seeing some depressed rates now.”

Lilly’s overall results in the third-quarter were “ho-hum,” according to one analyst. The company lowered its full-year profit forecast by 4 cents per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT