IBJNews

Lilly's sales-force restructuring to affect 1,600-plus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co.’s massive restructuring of its sales force will affect more employees than the Indianapolis-based drugmaker disclosed in early April.

Lilly will eliminate 1,624 positions from its U.S. sales force in July, according to a notice the company made to the Indiana Department of Workforce Development. The filing was dated April 26.

Those losing their jobs will have the opportunity to apply for as many as 560 sales positions within Lilly, the company said. Those who do not find new jobs by July 15 will be let go.

Among those affected are 379 workers on “fixed-duration” contracts that are scheduled to end during the first half of this year, anyway, Lilly said.

When Lilly first disclosed its planned sales force cuts on April 11, it said about 30 percent of its full-time U.S. sales positions would disappear. That statement referred to the estimated 700 full-time, permanent positions that will be cut.

But including the fixed-duration employees, Lilly is actually cutting its sales force by nearly 40 percent, Lilly spokesman Scott MacGregor said.

In April, the company said the layoffs would number “fewer than 1,000,” with less than 20 of those cuts occurring in Indiana.

In January, Lilly estimated that its sales force reductions would require severance payments of $26 million.

Lilly is slashing its sales force because its U.S. patents on two of its blockbuster drugs—the antidepressant Cymbalta and the osteoporosis drug Evista—are soon to expire. When that happens, cheaper generic copies of those drugs will steal their combined $4.7 billion in annual U.S. revenue.

“We’re just planning and expecting to lose that revenue and have had to make some changes in accordance with that,” MacGregor said in April.

The job cuts are primarily in Lilly’s Bio-Medicines division, which includes neuroscience, cardiovascular and osteoporosis drugs, the notice to the state said. 

Lilly had hoped that these cuts wouldn’t come. It had two neuroscience drugs in Phase 3 trials last year, both of which failed to meet their goals. One drug, mGlu 2/3, was supposed to be a new antipsychotic drug like Lilly’s former best-seller Zyprexa, but without Zyprexa’s side effects. Lilly halted studies of that drug when it proved ineffective.

The other drug was solanezumab, Lilly’s leading candidate to slow the effects of Alzheimer’s. That drug showed some encouraging signs, but regulators told Lilly it needs to conduct another clinical trial of the drug before they’ll consider approving it.

Lilly employs a total of 17,000 workers in the United States, with 11,000 in Indiana.

Other parts of Lilly’s business continue to grow, offsetting the impact of the patent expirations on Cymbalta and Evista. But Wall Street analysts still expect Lilly’s overall revenue to fall from $22.6 billion last year to as low as $20 billion next year.

Lilly’s revenue already declined from an all-time high of $24.3 billion in 2011, after the patent expirations of its blockbuster cancer drug Gemzar in 2010 and Zyprexa in 2011. Lilly has been furiously trying to launch new drugs to replace the roughly $10 billion it will lose from the patent expiration of these four drugs, but has largely been stymied in that quest so far.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Remember the Zyprexa scandal
    The Eli Lilly company made an astounding $70 BILLION on Zyprexa that they PUSHED on the elderly and underage children (*Viva Zyprexa* Lilly sales rep slogan) with wanton disregard for the side effects *FIVE at FIVE* The Zyprexa antipsychotic drug,whose side effects can include weight gain and diabetes, was sold to Veterans,children in foster care, elderly in nursing homes. *Five at Five* was the Zyprexa sales rep slogan, meaning *5mg dispensed at 5pm would keep patients quiet*. *Tell the truth don't be afraid*-- Daniel Haszard FMI zyprexa-victims(DOT)com
  • A House of Cards?
    On the one hand, one wonders if these people know what they're doing. On the other hand, they sure know how to obfuscate what they're doing, especially when it comes to announcements of job cutbacks, etc. I wouldn't buy their stock and, unless they were the only makers of some drug I vitally needed, I wouldn't go out of my way to buy their drugs. Back in the day, before Lechleiter, et al., Lilly had some credibility.
  • Generics are stealing?
    "...cheaper generic copies of those drugs will steal their combined $4.7 billion in annual U.S. revenue." What kind of writing is this? Is the writer trying to lead us to believe that the creation of generic drugs is illegal or improper?
  • Good for them...
    Awesome, they can get rehired. Good for them. What about the 60 local Indy area workers that have lost or are losing them jobs because Lilly just outsourced them to India and Indian workers that were shipped over here to take their jobs? Why isn't that story getting any press?
  • What gripe?
    Teresa, Lilly makes a drug you could benefit from. Your comment is rambling and unfocused.
  • My gripe
    If I can avoid a lilly product,here I go. They will send these jobs elsewhere (overseas). Will they be made safely? I doubt it. Shame on lilly,you make Prozac for the masses who need to control/reduce the everyday depression and anxiety of NO JOBS here to be found.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT