IBJNews

Lilly's second-quarter profits surge 16 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co.’s profits spiked 16 percent in the second quarter and the company raised its forecast for the rest of the year.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker recorded profits of $1.3 billion, or $1.22 per share, during the three months ended June 30. Excluding a $27 million charge for severance payments to employees Lilly is laying off, the company’s earnings per share were $1.24.

On that basis, Wall Street analysts expected Lilly to earn just $1.10 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial Network.

Lilly’s revenue for the quarter rose 9 percent to $5.7 billion, also beating analysts’ expectations of $5.6 billion.

Sales growth in the quarter was led by Lilly’s lung cancer drug Alimta (up 43 percent), followed by its antidepressant Cymbalta (up 17 percent) and its anti-impotence pill Cialis (up 15 percent). Lilly’s bestseller, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, saw its sales rise 5 percent.

"Lilly continued to deliver solid financial results in the second quarter, driven by volume-based revenue gains and ongoing cost-containment efforts that resulted in double-digit earnings growth," Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a statement.

He added, “This strong financial performance enables us to fund our R&D pipeline of nearly 70 clinical stage assets and make strategic acquisitions in order to deliver an increased number of innovative medicines to patients in the future."

Lilly’s lack of new medicines to replace Zyprexa and Cymbalta, which will lose their patent protection in 2011 and 2013, respectively, has spooked investors. Lilly’s shares have essentially treaded water this year, falling 2 percent to $34.95 apiece.

Lilly no longer gives quarterly profit forecasts. But in April, it said it expected to earn $4.40 to $4.55 per share this year, excluding special items but including a 35-cent-per-share hit from the new health reform law.

Thursday, the company raised its forecast by a dime a share, to a range of $4.50 to $4.65, excluding special items.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Zyprexa profits
    Eli Lilly Zyprexa Claims Still Unresolved



    Eli Lilly Zyprexa can cause diabetes I took Zyprexa a powerful Lilly schizophrenic drug for 4 years it was prescribed to me off-label for post traumatic stress disorder was ineffective costly and gave me diabetes.

    This is a powerful drug that can damage a young person physiologically for life. Please take with caution and learn as much as you can about side effects. Eli Lilly's #1 cash cow Zyprexa drug sale $40 billion dollars so far,has a ten times greater risk of causing type 2 diabetes over the non-user of Zyprexa. So,here we have a conflict of interest that this same company also is a big profiteer of diabetes treatment.

    Daniel Haszard Zyprexa whistle-blower

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT