IBJNews

Lilly's Zyprexa pact with health providers wins approval

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. has won approval of a $4.5 million settlement with five union health funds and an insurer that alleged improper marketing of the company's best-selling medication, Zyprexa, raised their costs.

U.S. District Judge Jack Weinstein in Brooklyn, N.Y., approved the settlement at a hearing Thursday. The so-called third-party payors claimed Indianapolis-based Lilly’s marketing of Zyprexa, a schizophrenia treatment, caused them to pay more for the drug than what it was worth. A plaintiffs’ expert had estimated damages in the case as high as $7.7 billion, according to a 2010 appeals-court decision.

The U.S. appeals court in New York in September 2010 reversed Weinstein’s 2008 ruling that granted class-action status to third-party payors, forcing them to carry on with the litigation individually. The appeals court found that the link between marketing Zyprexa to doctors and the injury claimed by the payors was “attenuated.”

“It appears to be fair and reasonable,” Weinstein said about the settlement. “The class members of the previously certified class have been adequately consulted and protected.”

“This settlement represents a positive outcome for Eli Lilly, and allows us to return our focus to the patients and health-care professionals who rely on our medications,” Lilly spokeswoman Keri McGrath Happe said in an e-mail.

The plaintiffs include the New York-based United Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund; Mid-West National Life Insurance Co. of Tennessee; and the Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund, which represents current and retired New York City Police sergeants and their families.

At a Dec. 19 hearing, Thomas Sobol, a lawyer for the benefit providers, told Weinstein he conducted a search and found no others beyond the six entities.

“I can represent to the court that all of the clients assent to the resolution,” Sobol, a partner at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP in Boston, told Weinstein. Anthony Vale, a partner at Pepper Hamilton LLP in Philadelphia, represented Lilly.

Zyprexa had $5.03 billion in sales in 2010. Sales of the drug are expected to decline by more than $3 billion this year, Lilly said Jan. 5, as it lost its patent. Zyprexa is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

The plaintiffs said Lilly’s allegedly excessive claims about Zyprexa’s usefulness compared with similar drugs and about its safety violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Pharm company in Indiana?
    I'm surprised that Eli Lilly continues to decay in Indiana. They should band with the region's biggest research and pharm companies in Illinois. They're just forgoing the potential resources and talent by hanging out in the middle of nowhere.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT