IBJNews

Local private equity firm unveils $316M investment fund

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state’s largest private equity firm has finished raising $316 million for its biggest investment fund to date, company officials told IBJ on Wednesday.

Hammond Kennedy Whitney & Co., based in Indianapolis with an office in New York, finalized its latest investment pool on March 31.

Dubbed HKW Capital Partners IV, the fund follows in the footsteps of the firm's $255 million round that ended in late 2007. That fund went toward acquiring 14 companies. An earlier $100 million fund also acquired 14 companies.

With the latest fund, HKW is following its historic strategy of acquiring controlling interests in North American companies in the energy services, infrastructure and medical products industries. It is targeting those sectors because they all have growth projections that well exceed forecasts for the broader economy, said Chairman Glenn Scolnik.

Key drivers for medical products include aging Baby Boomers and their growing demand for health care, Scolnik said. On the energy side, horizontal drilling and North America’s push for energy independence have created openings for support services in which the equity firm invests.

Eighty-one percent of investors in HKW Capital Partners IV were institutional entities, the firm said. That included six insurance companies, four fund-of-funds, two state pension funds, one private-university endowment and a handful of individuals. HKW did not disclose the other investors.

One of the fund-of-funds was AlpInvest Partners, which invested with money it manages for the Indiana Public Retirement System pension fund.

HKW describes its acquisition focus as “lower middle-market companies.” The firm generally invests in companies that report between $20 million and $200 million in annual revenue and $5 million to $30 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Among other requisites, the firm says it looks for “honest and talented management teams," low risk of “technological obsolescence,” and defined growth plans showing sustainability.

Companies must indicate significant growth ahead of them. Owning most of the market share could hurt odds of getting an investment from the firm, because that means there may be little room to grow.

“We’ve passed on a lot of companies that were wonderful companies that didn’t have any prospects for growth,” Scolnik said.

The age of a company doesn’t directly factor into HKW’s investment decisions, said partner Jim Snyder. But the firm steers away from startups and groups that could burn through cash.

“We want companies that have a history of profitability,” Snyder said.

The firm usually spends four to five years building capital for a fund, Scolnik said, and maintains its stakes in individual companies four to five years before divesting.

HKW began investing money from the new fund in November 2012 to acquire a stake in Brant Instore Corp., a Canadian business that offers screen and digital printing, and distribution.

Since then, HKW has invested in three others: Mobile Tech Inc. in Oregon, Specialized Desanders Inc. in Alberta, Canada, and EnerSafe Inc. in Texas.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT