IBJNews

Local automotive supplier in line for new city incentive

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A vacant industrial building on the city’s near-west side that’s been damaged by vandals is expected to get a second lease on life thanks to a new property-tax abatement available from the city of Indianapolis.

The 84,000-square-foot warehouse at 1850 Oliver Ave. is set to be purchased and rehabbed by Van’s Electrical Systems, a supplier of automotive components, pending approval by Metropolitan Development Commission members May 16. MDC staff have blessed the abatement.

What’s unusual about the three-year abatement is that it would be the first given by the city under a program passed by the Legislature in 2011. The incentive allows an owner to pay no property taxes for three years if a building is at least 50,000 square feet and is still vacant after being on the market for more than a year.

The goal is to attract tenants to older, unoccupied industrial or commercial buildings that typically would not qualify for normal tax abatements. The warehouse at 1850 Oliver Ave. was built in 1983.

The abatement won’t result in a lot of new jobs—just five, paying $14.71 per hour. Twenty-two retained positions pay $17.45 per hour. But the benefits extend beyond employment figures, said Ryan Hunt, the MDC’s senior project manager.

“When a building stays vacant for a long time, there can be vandalism,” Hunt said. “In this case, it was pretty extensive.”

Thieves stripped the building of its electrical wiring, air-conditioners and copper wiring.

A paper company moved out of the warehouse a few years ago, and the building’s out-of-state owner had let it slide into foreclosure.

A normal abatement that typically is longer than three years wouldn’t benefit Van’s as much because the $427,000 the company will spend to refurbish the building will increase the assessed valuation only $149,450, Hunt said.

Van’s is expected to save $155,644 in property taxes during the three years.

Company President Andrew Van Vlymen declined to discuss the incentive prior to its approval.

Van’s is located at 2541 Kentucky Ave. on the southwest side, south of the company’s proposed new location on Oliver Avenue. The company has committed to the city to find a buyer for its old location.

Founded in 1959 by Van Vlyman’s father, Marvin Van Vlymen Sr., Van’s supplies vehicle electrical systems made by 45 manufacturers. Andrew’s brother, Stephen, also is involved in the family business.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT