IBJNews

Local brokerage Goelzer reaches $500,000 settlement with SEC

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Goelzer Investment Management Inc. has agreed to pay $500,000 to settle charges from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it misled many of its clients over a period of 13 years, costing them hundreds of thousands of dollars in trading fees.

The SEC disclosed the settlement Wednesday after sanctioning Goelzer for improper disclosure and compliance related to the firm’s practice of using itself as a broker on client trades.

Also named in the settlement agreement was CEO Gregory W. Goelzer, 54, the son of company founder Don Goelzer.

Goelzer Investment Management, founded in 1969, has been registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC since 1998. The company has about 20 employees, 400 private and institutional clients, and $950 million in assets under management.

The SEC said Goelzer, since at least 2000 and through this year, directed its advisory clients to make trades using Goelzer as the broker without offering other options for executing the trades, as the SEC requires.

According to the SEC, the brokerage misled advisory clients by telling them that they would receive the “best price and execution” on trades by using Goelzer as the broker.

“This disclosure was misleading, as GIM did not take steps to ensure that it was seeking best price and execution for its advisory clients,” the SEC said.

The SEC also said the brokerage told investors in disclosures that “clients who do choose another broker/dealer may not always obtain best price and execution when trades are effected at a broker/dealer other than Goelzer. In particular, clients would not be able to participate in and receive the benefits of lower commission costs as a result of Goelzer’s use of volume transactions block trades.”

The SEC said that statement also was misleading because Goelzer clients “never benefited from lower commissions when GIM aggregated client trades for average pricing purposes.”

In fact, the SEC said, had Goelzer done as it promised, clients “would have saved $309,994 in commission costs from January 2005 through March 2011.”

Goelzer agreed to return the $309,994 to affected clients, and pay $135,000 in civil penalties and $53,800 in interest.

In addition to the fine, Goelzer has agreed to take numerous steps to ensure it complies with SEC regulations. Among them is employing a compliance officer for at least five years who will not take any other position with the company.

During the SEC’s investigation, Goelzer hired a compliance consultant to review the firm’s policies and procedures, and to make sure the firm was making no further violations. As part of the settlement, that consultant will conduct annual compliance reviews for 2013 and 2014.

In addition, Goelzer was ordered to post a notice of the violations on its website within 10 days and to send existing advisory clients notice within 30 days.

“We have fully cooperated with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and we take our responsibility regarding compliance policies and procedures very seriously," Greg Goelzer said in a prepared statement. "After conducting a comprehensive review of our firm’s compliance program, we have implemented internal controls and enhanced our supervisory framework, which now is overseen by a full-time, independent Chief Compliance Officer. We are confident our best practices will more effectively serve our valued clients, whom it has been our privilege to advise for nearly 45 years.”
 
The SEC also Wednesday sanctioned A.R. Schmeidler & Co., the New York-based subsidiary of Hudson Valley Bank, for similar violations. The firm agreed to pay more than $1 million to settle the claims.

“These cases send a clear message to dually registered investment advisers and broker-dealers,” Andrew Ceresney, co-chief of the SEC’s enforcement division, said in a prepared statement. “Investment advisers must carefully analyze whether their clients are obtaining the most beneficial terms reasonably available for their orders.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Thanks Bernie
    Thanks to Bernie Madoff, the government will never leave financial firms alone. That being said, this is a crap article meant to slander a good company. Thanks IBJ for showing that facts aren't important to your reporting of "news".
  • Yes
    Read some other articles...they picked this story up from Reuters...totally misrepresented the facts.
  • This is a misrepresentation
    This article is a misrepresentation of the facts. Shame on the IBJ. No one was deliberately cheated, they has an incredible history of integrity and dedicated professional services. It's also important that they left out the fact that all commissions were said to be returned? This is a sad attempt at a reputable firm's reputation.
  • Greed
    YThis sort of thing seems to be discovered way too much!
  • It's always about the money
    So, does any of the $500,000 go back to the people who were cheated?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

    ADVERTISEMENT