Local environmental contractor declares bankruptcy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the Indianapolis area’s largest environmental contractors has declared bankruptcy.

ESI Environmental Inc., 5232 W. 79th St., filed for Chapter 7 liquidation in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Oct. 1.

The firm listed assets of $41,466 and liabilities of nearly $35.3 million. The largest secured creditor, Churchill Capital Inc. in Minneapolis, is owed $16.2 million on a temporary bridge loan it provided to ESI.

Founded in 1992, ESI ranked as the area’s second-largest environmental contractor based on revenue, according to the most recent IBJ statistics. It listed revenue of $16 million in 2009, down from $23 million the previous year.

Employee headcount also dropped during the period, from 103 in 2008 to 68 last year.

ESI specialized in the treatment of non-hazardous wastewater, oil recovery and recycling, industrial cleaning, lab packing and environmental demolition.

Phone calls to ESI's office were not answered Friday morning. A message left on the home answering machine ESI President and CEO Tom Gawlik was not returned. The lawyer who filed ESI's bankruptcy papers didn’t return a phone call left Friday morning.


  • Great
    Environmental remediation in this view is really essential. Environmental contractors too are playing crucial roles to our society.
  • Deserved
    I worked for ESI, and these folks finally reaped what they sowed. Nothing but under the table dealings and political glad-handing. Employees were instructed to look the other way if something wasn't above board. Good riddance!
  • Could of done it yourself for less than $100
    atlasShrugged, Bee Environmental, like many others, are remediation/removal companies that usually work for buisinesses who can pay big money for the use of their expensive vehicles. You get the same price for this use because that's what they can get for it elseware. ESI Environmental was a place that they would offload/dispose of what you paid to remove. Bee was simply the delivery system of this material. ESI would charge between $0.10 and $0.20 per gallon of waste and could of even provided a container if you had a pickup truck. A $40.00 rotary pump and some hose from the hardware store and you could of disposed of this yourself for less than $100.00. Too bad ESI is out of the game. Bee didn't take your oil to ESI anyway. They were banned for allegedly causing ESI alot of trouble and money in the recent past. Maybe one of ESI's competitors would be so gracious if your neighbor could find someone to, "do it themselves."
  • they all charge too much
    I don't get it. The other day I decided I would find a company to pump out an old heating oil tank in my basement. In the old days they would do that for free; sometimes even pay you a little for the oil. But those days are long gone. I had trouble finding anyone to do it. And when I did Bee Environmental charged me $450. Highway robbery. They should have removed the old tank from the basement for a fee that size, but no, $450 just to pump out the oil. These environmental, hazardous waste type companies charge an arm and a leg for everything they do. So people avoid them like the plague. I don't know who to blame. I don't. I think the State probably has a finger in all this. They want you to be mold free, lead free and get those oil tanks out. But then they break you with the cost. Go to IDEM's site and they tell you, we don't recommend contractors. Well isn't that convenient. So we don't know where to look and we overpay. Hard to believe one of them is going out of business. The guys I talked to came out on two successive days. Each day driving very expensive looking oil trucks. So I guess that's where my money went. But the old lady that lives next door needs an old tank pumped in her basement. A lot of people do in these hundred year old homes in Irvington. And she can't pay $450. So I think this is an industry in distress. I do. People are being gouged. I feel gouged. And I'm sure no one at IDEM or the state or county health departments could care less. Disengaged. Government is becoming disengaged from the taxpayers.
    • Why The Harassment?
      Harassing people at home passed for journalism these days? Sounds to me like this is another victim of the construction downturn. No need to call the guy at home. Poor fellow probably feels bad enough already.

      Last night one of the TV stations had a "reported" knocking on the door of the poor teacher in New Castle that hit those kids. Why? What can you possible expect them to say?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.