Barnes & Thornburg enters top 100 on list of largest law firms

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A spate of office openings and an acquisition have helped catapult Barnes & Thornburg LLP into the upper echelon of the nation’s largest law firms, at a time when the slumbering economy has forced most other big firms to cut staff.

The Indianapolis-based law firm ranked 87th in The National Law Journal’s most recent annual listing of the nation’s 250 largest firms, marking its highest-ever ranking.

Barnes & Thornburg moved up from its 109th-place ranking in 2008, by increasing its lawyer numbers 8 percent, to 483, in offices in seven states and Washington, D.C. The firm has 233 lawyers in Indianapolis and is the second largest in the city, according to the most recent IBJ statistics. 

“It’s an exciting time for Barnes & Thornburg,” Managing Partner Alan Levin said in a prepared statement. “The firm’s financial strength and recent growth certainly run counter to the rest of the industry and that creates a significant opportunity for the firm and its expanding client base.”
Barnes & Thornburg grew its roster of attorneys by acquiring Minneapolis-based Parsinen Law Firm PA, which added 22 lawyers, and by opening offices in Columbus, Ohio; Wilmington, Del.; and Atlanta. Together, the three account for five lawyers. The firm also hired several veteran lawyers and new associates.

Altogether, Barnes & Thornburg added 69 lawyers the past year. But the number falls to 37, the figure cited by NLJ, when considering normal attrition.

Its growth far outpaced the overall performance of the nation’s biggest law firms, which collectively reduced their headcounts by roughly 4 percent so far this year, according to the New York-based trade publication. 

That’s in stark contrast to average annual growth of nearly 4 percent the past 20 years, NLJ said. So, the decline this year, coupled with the usual growth rate, roughly equates to the loss of 10,000 lawyer jobs, the publication estimated.

“Obviously, the numbers collected this year show a profession in turmoil,” NLJ Editor David Brown said upon releasing the rankings this week. “Perhaps it's not surprising, but this year's stats are certainly unprecedented.”

Another locally based firm added lawyers as well. Baker & Daniels LLP increased its number of attorneys from 273 to 286 from the previous year but still fell in the rankings, from 138th to 149th.

Ice Miller LLP, conversely, lost 16 lawyers and fell three notches, to 169th, according to the rankings.

A handful of regional and national firms that have a presence in Indianapolis also made the top 250 list. San Francisco-based Littler Mendelson ranked 45th; Greenville, S.C.-based Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC, 100th; Cincinnati-based Frost Brown Todd LLC, 113th; and Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, 139th.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.