Local paperboard plant with 161 workers to close in March

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

AGI-Shorewood Group plans to close its litho-paperboard plant in Indianapolis, putting 161 employees out of work by the end of March, the company announced Thursday.

“The decision to close the plant was largely driven by the need to manage excess capacity across the ASG Americas platform,” Stamford, Conn.-based ASG said in a prepared statement.

The plant, located at 620 S. Belmont Ave., southwest of downtown, has been making paperboard packaging since the early 1970s. It was known as Shorewood Packaging until 2011, when it merged with AGI World.

“Indianapolis is one of five ASG litho paperboard plants in the Americas, and to stay competitive, ASG is taking the steps necessary to most efficiently fulfill customer demand across our platform,” ASG Americas CEO Mark Caines said in the statement. “This difficult decision is not a reflection of the hard work and commitment of our Indianapolis team members. We understand this impacts many Indianapolis team members and their families, and we will do all we can to support them during this transition.”

Employment has been on the downward trend at the plant over the last several years. Shorewood had 340 workers at the facility in 2007 when it installed modern Heidelberg Speedmaster presses as part of a plant upgrade.

AGI-Shorewood employs nearly 3,000 people worldwide at 18 plants in North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America, and eight service centers in the United States, United Kingdom, France, China and Australia.


  • Great Obfuscation
    I love this: "driven by the need to manage excess capacity across the ASG Americas platform.” Looks like his press release was written by an over-zealous MBA student. I think he meant to say "Sales are way down."

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.