IBJNews

Longtime car retailer closes on west side

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A longtime fixture along West Washington Street, near Indianapolis International Airport, has driven off into the sunset.

National Car Sales, for years known for its commercials featuring basketball coach Bobby “Slick” Leonard, closed last week after more than 20 years in the market.

The closure resulted from the sale in August of Indianapolis parent Arelco Inc. to Enterprise Holdings Inc. Enterprise, owned by the Taylor family of St. Louis, operates rental car companies Enterprise, Alamo and National.

Arelco retained, at least for now, Execucar Leasing, along with National Remarketing, a wholesaler of rental cars.

Enterprise acquired Arelco’s 4,300 vehicles, 31 Alamo and National rental locations in nine states, and Arelco’s headquarters and car sales and service division at 7111 W. Washington St.

 Arelco had about 400 employees. An Enterprise spokeswoman did not respond to questions about how many Arelco employees were rehired.

Initially, Enterprise said it would operate Arelco divisions “in substantially the same form” after the sale. However, last month it announced it would close National Car Sales, which is one block east of the still-shuttered former ATA Airlines headquarters.

Arelco’s former head of rental operations, Kim Smith, was retained by Enterprise Holdings to oversee Enterprise, Alamo and National brands at Indianapolis International.

Enterprise Holdings did not respond to questions about its plans for the Washington Street property.  It formerly operated an Enterprise Car Sales store just down the street from National Car Sales. Enterprise Car Sales has a remaining Indianapolis store on Pendleton Pike, near Interstate 465.

Enterprise Holdings has snapped up 25 other rental car franchises around the country since buying Alamo and National brands in 2007.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT