IBJNews

Loss of Camry production in state not certain, exec says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Toyota Motor Corp.’s top North American executive said the carmaker hasn’t decided to end a production deal that supplies it with 100,000 Camry sedans annually from Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.’s U.S. Subaru plant in Lafayette.

The contract-assembly arrangement at Subaru’s Lafayette plant between the carmakers could end after 2016, Tom Easterday, the factory’s executive vice president told television station WLFI and the Journal and Courier newspaper Nov. 13.

The plant has made Camrys since 2007 for Toyota, which owns 16.6 percent of Fuji Heavy, and has the option to continue, said Jim Lentz, head of Toyota’s North American operations.

“I’ve been involved in the discussions going on within Toyota, and then with Toyota and Subaru, and it has not been decided,” he said in an interview at the Los Angeles Auto Show Wednesday. “There’s still within the contract a certain period of time within which we have to renew. I think that window of time is just opening.”

Any production change for Camry, the top-selling U.S. car for more than a decade, is taken with great care as the Toyota City, Japan-based company seeks to sustain the model’s leadership. Camry led Honda Motor Co.’s Accord, its closest challenger, by more than 40,000 sales through October and Ford Motor Co.’s new Fusion sedan by 100,000.

Ford is boosting Fusion production by building it at a second plant as the Dearborn, Mich.-based company works to pare Camry’s lead in 2014.

It’s hard to see Toyota cutting its output, when there’s so much demand for the model from loyal, repeat buyers, said Jessica Caldwell, an analyst at Edmunds.com in Santa Monica, Calif.

“Losing capacity on that vehicle hadn’t been the direction they were going at all,” she said.

Toyota should sell about 415,000 Camrys this year, Bob Carter, Toyota’s U.S. senior vice president, said in a separate interview in Los Angeles. Going forward, the goal is to maintain Camry sales in the U.S. at the 400,000-unit level, he said.

Were Toyota to stop getting Camrys from the Subaru plant, it’s unlikely that volume would shift to its Georgetown, Ky., factory, the main builder of the model, Lentz said.

“There’s some period of time for both sides to evaluate what we do with production at that facility,” Lentz said. “There are a lot of different alternatives for us to look at,” he said, without elaborating.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Impreza
    Camry production ends 2016 and Impreza production starts 2016. No tax breaks will keep Camry around. Toyota has already announced, 2 day before this story, that they are for certain leaving the Lafayette plant.
  • backs of workers?
    Ummm....Italiano you do realize that those "tax breaks on the backs of workers" result in good paying jobs for the community which in turn results in small business success, local option income taxes, and benefits for thousands of mid-skill workers
  • consumers report
    no inside info here, but Consumers Report latest issue bumped camry off its recommended list due to new safety info, but subaru forester is tops in its class. Maybe need to make more subarus?
  • Another Sweetheart Tax Break
    And as soon as the state agrees to give them another tax break (on the backs of the workers of this state) production will remain in Lafayette until that one expires

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT