LOU'S VIEWS: Indianapolis International Film Festival offers [pop]cornucopia

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Once again, the Indianapolis International Film Festival (running through July 28) has an overwhelming number of movies on its schedule. And, once again, there are only so many hours in the day to see them. In the weeks leading up to the fest, I screened more than a dozen—including, as jurist, the three finalists, which I’m sworn not to disclose.

Having only scratched the surface of the wide-ranging lineup, I won’t offer a best list, but I’m still comfortable pushing you toward two remarkable, if downbeat, films—one Indiana-connected and one not. And I can recommend a few others, with reservations.

ae-medora-15col.jpg “Medora,” focuses on a winless basketball team and its town. (Photo courtesy of Indianapolis International Film Festival)

The Hoosier-related one is “Medora,” a gutsy documentary about the losingest team in Indiana high school basketball. There are plenty of reasons for the Medora Hornets’ long streak of goose eggs in the win column, chief among them the fact that the Jackson County town has one of the few remaining unconsolidated schools in the state. With a senior class numbering in the dozens, it’s no wonder the team has trouble competing.

But to the filmmakers’ credit, this is not a movie where “Gonna Fly Now” blasts during a training sequence, inspiring the kids to greatness. Basketball blunders are only a small part of the problems facing Medora, which is representative of small towns across America where the disappearance of factory work left a population with a coin-flip choice of hopelessness or relocation.

The “Medora” filmmakers (including Found magazine creator Davy Rothbart) capture the humiliating games, yes, but also the limited choices, the petty crimes, the military recruiting, the family messes, and the awkwardness of being an adolescent in an environment where just doing OK is a remarkable achievement.

No, it doesn’t offer any answers—and its final few minutes try to make a case that the rest of the film hasn’t supported. But I can’t recall ever watching a sports film where I wanted so badly for a team to win—on and off the court.

Sports films are common at festivals—especially Hoosier ones. So are artist documentaries. This time, IIFF offers “Persistence of Vision,” chronicling the decades-long attempt by visionary Richard Williams to create a full-length animated movie epic.

ae-main-pov-15col.jpg “Persistence of Vision,” tells of an animator who loses control of his work. (Photo courtesy of Indianapolis International Film Festival)

Unlike most visual arts, though, movie-making on this scale requires millions of dollars, which Williams attempts to acquire through his London studio primarily by crafting movie title sequences (including, famously, some of the Pink Panther films) and commercials (remember the one where the muscle-bound guy climbs a cliff to slap Jovan onto his cheeks?). Serving as animation director on the ground-breaking “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” certainly helped, too.

But this is not an artist-realizes-his-dream chronicle. And what happens to Williams can be interpreted as the expected fallout from obsessive arrogance, the fate of an artist trapped in a commercial business, or somewhere in between. Whatever the case, it’s a heartbreaking study of a man driven to perfection but having to deal with complex economic and cinematic realities.

For a more commercial crowd pleaser, consider “The Bounceback.” While it can be as crude as “American Pie” or “The Hangover,” this well-made independent somehow manages to stay endearing, offering a surprisingly honest twist on the romcom genre.

In it, an Austin-based couple has split to go separate coastal ways. But when he finds out via a Facebook post that she is visiting a friend back in Texas, he decides to follow his romantic instincts and hop a plane to “accidentally” run into her. The film smartly manages to keep the couple separate through most of its running time, allowing them to trek through Austin nightlife (including an “air sex” competition, which is like air guitar but, well, you get it) and meet some surprisingly human characters along the way.

In all, “The Bounceback” is much brighter, funnier and richer in character than your average Hollywood Will they?/Won’t they? romance. And its ending doesn’t feel decided by a focus group.

Speaking of romantic comedies, “In Return” should satisfy those who want a more PG-13 date-night flick—you’ll just have to get over its logic-defying ending. Up to that point, it’s a charmer about an aimless guy who falls for a woman he meets on the street one night—a woman he doesn’t realize lives on the streets.

As for more sports films, “Dream Team 1935” doesn’t offer many surprises once you learn that the scrappy, underdog Latvian team won the first European basketball championships. But it’s beautifully shot (think Baltic “Hoosiers”), doesn’t hide the fact that excellence requires more training than just a single ball-shooting montage, and features the expected-but-nonetheless-throat-lumping rundown of what happened to the players and coaches after the big game.

Some of the other festival films I’ve already caught proved worthwhile if less successful overall. “Hey Bartender” offers an interesting, fast-moving, behind-the-scenes look at the craft bartending world but loses momentum when it opts to shift focus to a bar-of-the-year competition.

Similarly, “Out of Print” is an insightful look at the changes in the book publishing industry and how we look at the printed word. Avoiding easy answers, it’s fascinating … until the final quarter or so when it turns into a too-obvious plea for teaching literacy to kids.

“They Wore the Red Suit” is terrific when it delves into the history of those who have made a living playing Santa Claus (of course, Santa Claus, Ind., serves a key role). The downside is that it’s framed as the filmmaker’s journey, which comes across as condescending. His story is far less interesting than the Santa-stand-ins we meet.

Still on the not-so-short short list of films I hope to see before the fest wraps up: “Liv and Igmar,” a documentary about the relationship between the actress and the filmmaker, “Bending Steel,” a look into the lives of old-time circus strongmen, and the festival closer “Don Jon,” which marks the writing and directing debut of actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

And I haven’t even started on the shorts yet.

Note: Most screenings are at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, but this year’s fest includes one-night-only, on-location showings as well. For a full schedule, visit indyfilmfest.org.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.