IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: IU Opera premieres 'Vincent'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

As ambitious an arts project as you are likely to find so far this century in central Indiana, IU Opera’s world premiere production of “Vincent” (through April 17) overflowed with stunning design and strong music. And the opening weekend brought both journalists and opera producers from around the country to Bloomington to see what composer Bernard Rands and librettist J.D. McClatchy have created. National press is already starting to hit.

Vincent IU Opera David Moore, plays tormented artist Vincent van Gogh, sharing the stage with outstanding visuals. (IU Photographic Services)

To be clear, Rands and McClatchy are heavy hitters. A 1984 Pulitzer Prize winner for “CantidelSole” and 2000 Grammy winner for “Cantid’Amor,” Rands has written for orchestras around the world, including a seven-year stint as composer-in-residence for the Philadelphia Orchestra. Conductor Riccardo Muti will be premiering Rands’ “DanzaPetrificada” with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra in May.

McClatchy is no slouch in the words department, either, having provided English versions of “The Magic Flute” and “The Barber of Seville” for the Metropolitan Opera. He also penned the libretto for Ned Rorem’s “Our Town” and spent the last 20 years serving as editor of The Yale Review.

I’ll leave it to others better versed to comment in detail on the intricacies of the music itself. I will say, though, that within minutes Rands relaxed anyone who thought the term “contemporary opera” had to be synonymous with atonal, dissonant, “difficult” music. “Who cares if you listen?” composer Milton Babbitt famously said (and, interestingly, is quoted in the latest IU Music magazine in an article unrelated to “Vincent”). His argument: Why should contemporary musicians be any more understandable to the general public than scientists and mathematicians?

I’m thankful the Rands score attempts to probe the psychology of van Gogh in a way that doesn’t forget that we’re in the theater for a transcendent experience, not for an endurance test or to prove that we can handle serious music. While the arc of van Gogh’s life may be familiar, the hope and beauty of the music helps keep matters dramatically interesting even when the rest slows down.

Performed here with pros alternating in the leading role, students providing support, and strong performances in the orchestra pit, “Vincent” has been given a worthy launch. The setting, mostly consisting of projections that take us into van Gogh’s perception of the world, works beautifully and the choices of key scenic elements—a chair, a tree—adapted from the artists’ paintings are smart without calling too much attention to themselves.

The libretto is, on one level, admirable for sticking close to the facts as revealed primarily in the letters exchanged between Vincent and his brother Theo. And there’s no ambiguity about this portrait of the artist as a frustrated would-be missionary. The downside of such fidelity is that the truthfulness hinders the ability of the piece to soar dramatically. (Sondheim’s “Sunday in the Park with George,” another artist-focused work, would be far less interesting if it stuck to the facts of Georges Seurat’s life.)

It doesn’t help that “Vincent” employs spoken dialogue in a seemingly haphazard way. That, combined with the fact that it’s sung in English, sometimes brings the work to the neutral zone between opera and musical theater, creating dramatic demands that the work doesn’t yet satisfy.

Female characters are nearly non-existent and male supporting characters are sketchily drawn (a mature performer might have made more of fellow artist Gauguin). The lead I saw on opening night, David Adam Moore, certainly has the look of van Gogh and the pipes to deliver the music, but he often seemed like he was waiting for his orchestral dining companion to hurry up and finish the meal so they could move on. Moments where the music is gorgeous often are accompanied by actors standing on stage with little to do.

In a concert or in a recording, that wouldn’t be an issue—and I suspect the reputation for “Vincent” will grow if it does get recorded. And it should. Rands, with IU as midwife, has birthed something rare and good here. With proper nurturing, it could grow into something truly outstanding.

I hope to have the opportunity to see it again in its next incarnation.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

  2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

  3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

  4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

  5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.

ADVERTISEMENT