IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: The Once and Farcical King rules in tuneful 'Spamalot'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry
There are few, if any, musicals as silly as “Monty Python’s Spamalot.”

The adaptation of the cult hit film “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” features a king who opts for clanging coconuts rather than riding an actual horse, a knight whose desire to fight continues even when his limbs have been removed, and a killer rabbit who (spoiler alert) can be felled only by a holy hand grenade.

In the world of “Spamalot,” the most extreme form of torture is being taunted by Frenchmen.
 

A&E A clueless king. (Photo/Zach Rosing)

But silly doesn’t have to mean dumb. One of the things that struck me seeing the joyous Indianapolis regional theater premiere of “Spamalot” at the Athenaeum (where it plays through June 29) is how smart the show actually is. What other musical earns laughs with jokes about class distinction, logical fallacies, and the relationship between man and God, all the while trusting that the audience is in on the jokes?

The story? King Arthur’s quest to round up knights for his round table (here, his “very, very, very, very, very round table”) is supplanted by another, divinely ordained quest—to find the Holy Grail. His efforts to achieve that lead to a series of trials—including the acquisition of “a shrubbery” and the complete destruction of the theatrical fourth wall between players and audience.

Purists may lament the ditching of the movie’s witch trial and Bridge of Death, but without these side trips the musical moves briskly. Weaving the rounding up of the knights into the memorable-but-not-plot-pushing early scenes of the movie helps considerably as well.


ae-spam03-1col.jpg A philosophical peasant (Photo/Zach Rosing)

The addition of the Lady of the Lake character allows for some of the show’s musical high points, especially as powerfully and hilariously sung here by Claire Wilcher. (With Wilcher belting “The Diva’s Lament,” I felt for the first time that sound from the Athenaeum mainstage might bleed through the walls to the biergarten rather than vice versa.)

This “Spamalot” comes courtesy of producer/director Bob Harbin who, during previous summers, offered “Cabaret,” “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum,” and others at the Athenaeum.

While those had their strengths, this is the most fully satisfying of his productions. Except for a wobbly castle, the show’s casual attitude never gives way to sloppiness. And it manages to stay professional without being overly polished. Credit Music Director Trevor Fanning, Choreographer Kenny Shepard and a well-mixed band for solid contributions. Costume Designer Jeff Farley and his crew clearly have been working since this time last year. One can only imagine the scene backstage.
 

ae-spam04-1col.jpg Taunting French knights (Photo/Zach Rosing)

Theatergoers here have come to expect professional, engaging work from Charles Goad (Arthur) and Paul Hansen (his underappreciated sidekick Patsy). But Harbin’s bench is deeper here than it has been in the past, with strong support mined from other companies, specifically Q Artistry Artistic Director Ben Asaykwee as the not-so-brave Sir Robin and EclecticPond’s Artistic Director Thomas Cardwell as Sir Lancelot (who, of course, likes to dance-a-lot).

And some sort of rising-to-the-occasion award should go to Pete Scharbrough as Sir Galahad. Usually in the background at Beef & Boards, Scharbrough holds his own in an in-your-face duet with Wilcher for “The Song that Goes Like This.”

Oh, and I would be remiss if I didn’t note the contributions of Bin Faaarkrekkion, the Honni Obikkionen Singers, and the good people of Finland. (Don’t ask. Just read your program.)•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT