IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: The Once and Farcical King rules in tuneful 'Spamalot'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry
There are few, if any, musicals as silly as “Monty Python’s Spamalot.”

The adaptation of the cult hit film “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” features a king who opts for clanging coconuts rather than riding an actual horse, a knight whose desire to fight continues even when his limbs have been removed, and a killer rabbit who (spoiler alert) can be felled only by a holy hand grenade.

In the world of “Spamalot,” the most extreme form of torture is being taunted by Frenchmen.
 

A&E A clueless king. (Photo/Zach Rosing)

But silly doesn’t have to mean dumb. One of the things that struck me seeing the joyous Indianapolis regional theater premiere of “Spamalot” at the Athenaeum (where it plays through June 29) is how smart the show actually is. What other musical earns laughs with jokes about class distinction, logical fallacies, and the relationship between man and God, all the while trusting that the audience is in on the jokes?

The story? King Arthur’s quest to round up knights for his round table (here, his “very, very, very, very, very round table”) is supplanted by another, divinely ordained quest—to find the Holy Grail. His efforts to achieve that lead to a series of trials—including the acquisition of “a shrubbery” and the complete destruction of the theatrical fourth wall between players and audience.

Purists may lament the ditching of the movie’s witch trial and Bridge of Death, but without these side trips the musical moves briskly. Weaving the rounding up of the knights into the memorable-but-not-plot-pushing early scenes of the movie helps considerably as well.


ae-spam03-1col.jpg A philosophical peasant (Photo/Zach Rosing)

The addition of the Lady of the Lake character allows for some of the show’s musical high points, especially as powerfully and hilariously sung here by Claire Wilcher. (With Wilcher belting “The Diva’s Lament,” I felt for the first time that sound from the Athenaeum mainstage might bleed through the walls to the biergarten rather than vice versa.)

This “Spamalot” comes courtesy of producer/director Bob Harbin who, during previous summers, offered “Cabaret,” “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum,” and others at the Athenaeum.

While those had their strengths, this is the most fully satisfying of his productions. Except for a wobbly castle, the show’s casual attitude never gives way to sloppiness. And it manages to stay professional without being overly polished. Credit Music Director Trevor Fanning, Choreographer Kenny Shepard and a well-mixed band for solid contributions. Costume Designer Jeff Farley and his crew clearly have been working since this time last year. One can only imagine the scene backstage.
 

ae-spam04-1col.jpg Taunting French knights (Photo/Zach Rosing)

Theatergoers here have come to expect professional, engaging work from Charles Goad (Arthur) and Paul Hansen (his underappreciated sidekick Patsy). But Harbin’s bench is deeper here than it has been in the past, with strong support mined from other companies, specifically Q Artistry Artistic Director Ben Asaykwee as the not-so-brave Sir Robin and EclecticPond’s Artistic Director Thomas Cardwell as Sir Lancelot (who, of course, likes to dance-a-lot).

And some sort of rising-to-the-occasion award should go to Pete Scharbrough as Sir Galahad. Usually in the background at Beef & Boards, Scharbrough holds his own in an in-your-face duet with Wilcher for “The Song that Goes Like This.”

Oh, and I would be remiss if I didn’t note the contributions of Bin Faaarkrekkion, the Honni Obikkionen Singers, and the good people of Finland. (Don’t ask. Just read your program.)•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!

ADVERTISEMENT