IBJNews

Marcadia Biotech principals ponder next course

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

As if it wasn’t enough of an achievement to sell a 5-year-old startup for what may total $537 million when all the money is counted.

The 11-employee Marcadia Biotech Inc. was generating enough cash flow prior to its sale to Swiss lifes sciences giant Roche that its investors ran into an unusual problem.

“Our venture-capital firms were going crazy. They never had a company that had to pay taxes,” said Fritz French, former CEO of Carmel-based Marcadia.

French and Kent Hawryluk, vice president of business development, on Tuesday morning outlined the company’s brief but lucrative life.

BioCrossroads' “Frameworx” discussion series drew more than 50 life science leaders to the 48th floor of Chase Tower. The setting was appropriate, given Carmel-based Marcadia’s lofty accomplishments. It’s become an affirmation of sorts that a company far removed from the venture-capitalist-clustered East and West Coasts can rise and flourish in central Indiana.

“It’s the kind of story that makes you say, ‘If these guys can do it, maybe I can, too,’” said David Johnson, CEO of BioCrossroads.

December's sale to Switzerland-based Roche is expected to generate at least $287 million for the company’s owners initially. Investors could reap an additional $250 million if one of Marcadia’s experimental drugs to treat diabetes reaches market.

Hawryluk noted the benefits of Marcadia’s earlier partnership with Merck, which helped finance the firm’s growth, in addition to the more than $15 million in venture capital that was raised.

Although neither he nor French would elaborate on the value of that partnership, “we still had $37 million on the books when we sold the company,” French said.

Marcadia was founded by Hawryluk and former Eli Lilly and Co. scientists Richard DiMarchi and Gus Watanabe.

The participation of the former Lilly scientists provided “instant credibility,” French said, an advantage that many startups don’t enjoy.

Marcadia also successfully deployed what has become standard practice of major pharmaceutical companies in recent years—operating on largely a contract basis with outside firms. Much of the work was conducted in DiMarchi’s laboratory at Indiana University, with compounds it generated outsourced to other partners, including a research center at the University of Cincinnati.

French and Hawryluk told of a razor-edge walk to engage interest in partners—first those with which they’d enter licensing agreements and later to seek a buyer.

“We really felt that we were getting terms we might not see again for at least a year or two,” Hawryluck said of the process as momentum for a sale grew last summer.

Playing into Marcadia’s favor was a handful of failures Roche had of late in snapping up small players in the diabetes sector.

“Wall Street had expected them to be in this area,” French said.

Marcadia is being absorbed within Roche. French and Hawryluk have been talking to Roche execs about possibly licensing a short-acting glucagon that Marcadia has been developing that could be used to treat those suffering episodes of low blood sugar. A deal could spawn a new company for the duo, but French was unsure Tuesday whether an agreement could be reached.

If that doesn’t transpire, “I don’t know (what I’ll do),” he said, responding to an audience question. “I’ll probably take a few months and think about what I’ll do next.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT