IBJNews

Marcadia may fetch up to $537 million in sale

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The December sale of Carmel-based Marcadia Biotech to Roche garnered at least $287 million for the company’s owners and could lead the Marcadia team to launch a firm using one of Marcadia’s experimental diabetes medicines.

New details about the deal were released Wednesday by Switzerland-based Roche, a massive pharmaceutical and diagnostic firm, which operates its North American diagnostic business out of Indianapolis. Marcadia’s investors could get an extra $250 million—on top of the $287 million in upfront cash—from Roche as its experimental drugs move closer and closer to market.

The sale was a “home run” for Marcadia’s investors, said Fritz French, who until Monday was Marcadia’s CEO. Before leading the company, French had been vice president for global marketing for a division of Guidant Corp.

Since its founding in 2006, Marcadia had attracted $16 million in venture capital, most of it in a 2007 infusion from California-based 5AM Ventures and Seattle-based Frazier Healthcare. But more recently, Marcadia had funded its drug development through deals with New Jersey-based Merck & Co. Inc. and Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co.

Those streams of revenue meant Marcadia didn’t have to sell, French said. But still, he and his management team started meeting with executives at other pharmaceutical firms about a year ago at the JP Morgan Health Care conference in San Francisco.

“Things just kind of developed with a number of companies,” French said. “Roche was the best bet from a lot factors, including financially.”

Marcadia was trying to develop numerous experimental diabetes medicines, based on research conducted at Indiana University in the labs of Richard DiMarchi, a former vice president of Lilly Research Laboratories in Indianapolis.

Under the sale to Roche, French said, IU will retain ownership of the drugs Marcadia was developing, but the licensing rights will shift to Roche.

French and most of the 11 employees at Marcadia now want to license from Roche a glucagon compound that Marcadia was developing with Lilly for patients with hypoglycemia. If his negotiations with Roche are successful, the former Marcadia team would form a new company to try to bring that compound to market.

Lilly already sells a glucagon drug, but its sales are less than $80 million a year. There are also other glucagons sold by Denmark-based Novo Nordisk A/S and other competitors, but they do not have huge sales levels.

French thinks that’s because they’re inconvenient. Lilly’s current glucagon product comes in a powder that must be mixed up with water and placed in a syringe before injection. But Marcadia was trying to develop a short-acting glucagon that could be stored as a solution in an injection “pen,” ready for immediate use during an episode of extremely low blood sugar.

The compound, known as MAR 531, is soon to start clinical trials.

The Marcadia management team, in addition to French and DiMarchi, included Jaswant Gidda, a former senior research adviser at Lilly; Kent Hawryluk, a former partner at Indianapolis-based Twilight Venture Partners; Ralph Riggin, a former research adviser at Lilly; Kristin Sherman, a former treasurer of Guidant; and Dr. Skip Vignati, a former medical director of endocrine research at Lilly.

“There’s a pretty rich pool of people that are here that want to stay in Indiana,” French said. “I hope this is just one of many more successes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Congratulations
    Hi Ruth & Skip,
    Very nice success. Way to go Skip.
    John Bradburn

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT