MARCUS: Debt and taxes are not the devil's doing

Morton Marcus
February 26, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

This national debt business is being overplayed. Critics characterize the debt as a giant burden, our most important national issue. Borrowing for the future, however, makes good sense when the debt contributes to economic growth.

The hitch is understanding the role debt plays in making the economy grow. Debt permits families to invest in housing, businesses in machinery, and governments in education, the environment, transportation and communications. These functions enable economic development and growth. Contrast this with credit card debt. People buy today to enjoy today things and experiences, knowing they will consume somewhat less in the future as they pay back what they borrowed plus interest on that debt.  

As “economic moralists,” you and I condemn people for not saving before buying. We say many people go into debt spending too much on trivial and unnecessary things. Credit card users would say we seek to constrain their economic freedom. They would deny that their purchases are trivial or unnecessary.

Consumer and business debt is different from government debt. Legislators choose to borrow for today, believing their programs will benefit us and our children when, as citizens of the future, we will pay back the debt. However, the decision to borrow is often made to avoid raising taxes.

Americans believed, rightly or wrongly, that fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan without raising taxes benefited the future of our country. Americans believed helping those who lost their homes and jobs in the recent recession, without raising taxes on the wealthiest and most secure members of society, would help the future of the country.  

The big question that no one answers remains: “Will higher taxes lead to a stronger economy?” Most people are so brainwashed they cannot conceive of beneficial effects of higher taxes. When we borrow to spend on health care for children, the future benefits. Borrowing to spend on health care for the elderly generates few future benefits. This does not mean we ignore the elderly. That’s why Medicare, unemployment compensation and other compassionate programs must be placed in a trust fund. Otherwise, today’s practical imperatives might overwhelm our ongoing moral concerns.

Higher taxes today have the moral advantage of accepting responsibility for today’s decisions. We didn’t do that for our current Middle-Eastern wars. Higher taxes on the wealthy have the beneficial effect of redistributing income to those who are less productive because they are poor.

Some observers believe the wealthier members of our society are more creative, productive, innovative and, hence, more valuable than the less-productive poor. Many who are poor, however, are incapacitated by their poverty. Innovation, creativity, even productivity are attributes that co-exist with a reasonable measure of economic security. Hunger and desperation rarely contribute to achievement.

The significant issue persists: How do we help the economy grow? Debt becomes insignificant in a healthy, growing economy. Debt for the right purposes helps the economy grow. Higher taxes on everyone today are also fine if they result in economic growth. Income redistribution through higher taxes on the wealthy also can contribute to economic growth and certainly can be used for our compassionate social goals.

Part of the debt paranoia is that a minor portion of the federal debt is held by people or governments abroad. Nonetheless, nearly 70 percent of the federal debt is owned by U.S. agencies, mutual funds, financial institutions and ordinary citizens. When we repay the principal amount owed and the corresponding interest, we are paying ourselves. The money initially used for investment goes back into circulation. It is neither a loss to the nation nor dead weight on the economy.

It would help if the anti-debt and anti-tax folks had a better understanding of how the world works.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


  • Economic Arrogance
    Mr. Marcus,

    The first and last sentence of your shallow missive summarize the height of arrogance and hubris that I have come to expect from the "economic experts" of our educational system. I'm sure you have considered the intellectual and economic acumen of those who read the IBJ. Are you teaching this drivel to students? Have you ever run a business? Do you really believe that tax payers should buy the Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??moral responsibilityÃ?¢ââ??¬ï¿½ argument for taxation and the petty lessons of Ã?¢ââ??¬Ã?â??good debtÃ?¢ââ??¬ï¿½. Do you honestly believe your mundane economic lesson applies in todayÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢s broken Keynesian model. Instead, demonstrate your knowledge of reality. Demonstrate why feeding a broken, corrupted social net will not create the benefits of your lessons. Demonstrate your understanding of the complete ineptitude of our elected representatives and why they donÃ?¢ââ??‰â??¢t understand how to use debt to produce anything but more debt. Demonstrate to your readers why they should feel compelled to pay higher taxes in the name of compassion when they know it will NEVER happen. Demonstrate to us why you cant pay debt with debt and achieve anything but bankruptcy. Perhaps it is you, Mr. Marcus, who needs a better understanding of how the world works.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...