My fellow Tea Party Republicans, I have an idea. Let’s enact
legislation requiring immigrants and homosexuals to wear purple hats. If we are going to treat them differently, we have to
know who they are—on sight. Then we can confront someone wearing a purple hat and if he doesn’t speak English,
boom, back to Mexico. Likewise homosexuals. We do not want them here, either.
There are no legal challenges to the current law banning same-sex marriages, but the law does not sufficiently set apart
and condemn homosexuality. The proposed marriage rights amendment that passed the House and is before the Senate in committee
goes a long way. It prohibits not only the union but the other incidences of marriage attached to any unmarried couple.
Under this legislation, homosexuals cannot receive violence protection against assault by their partner, cannot automatically
make health care decisions for their partner in an emergency, cannot qualify for partner’s benefits for health insurance
or life insurance, cannot share custody of their shared children, and cannot adopt. But the amendment does not go far enough.
We need to compel gays to wear purple hats so we can identify them and encourage them to live in San Francisco or Key West,
anywhere but our God-protected sacred land.
I confess—this idea is not original. Remember armbands? They have been used to identify the people who are not like
us for hundreds of years — before even the Spanish Inquisition or the Aryan Society of Germany. This kind of designation
and identification of the objects of righteous wrath has been seen many times before in many variations—and it works.
We cannot be derailed by the moderate Republicans and some Democrats who supported the election of a Republican majority
in the Indiana Legislature with the encouragement of the governor in a good-faith effort to effect a sound fiscal policy.
Pay no attention when those moderates claim that this well-intentioned effort has unleashed the serpent of prejudice and hatred
that may send Indiana reeling economically, socially and morally.
The purple hat legislation will be no ordinary bill. It will go to the core, to the heart, of who we are as Hoosiers. Hoosiers
are white, heterosexual, English-speaking, Christian men and women. The purple hat legislation will tell the world that we
will not abide anybody that is not just like us. That seems fair. Anybody that does not meet our definition of Hoosier must
be penalized and encouraged to leave. Live and let live—but not on the banks of the Wabash.
We have to carefully teach our children. They are not born with the same fine-tuned understanding that we have about what
God wants. They are too pure and accepting of their fellow man. That is why you must continue your good work in suppressing
attempts to enact school bullying legislation. Our children must be encouraged to harass their undesirable classmates, the
kids wearing the little purple beanies.
We could take the time to overcome our ignorance and learn that those with the purple hats are more similar to us than we
like to think. Though some have problems with our language or have a different sexual orientation, we may learn that they
have ambitions, goals and ideals—that they are human beings who love our country and this state. But why bother? Better
to treat them like toxic waste and ship them out.
Why stop with immigrants and homosexuals? With this good idea we can double back and pick up the gypsies and the Jews and
the blacks and the Catholics. Well, not the blacks, they do not need a purple hat—after all, they are black.
What difference does it make if we precipitate an economic disaster? Who cares that we will lose opportunity for businesses
that may have otherwise considered moving to Indiana and for conventioneers who will undoubtedly revel elsewhere? We may not
be as economically viable, but at least Indiana will be ours.
Your legislative representatives are going to love this idea. Soon we will have the Indiana we have all been hoping and praying
for.•
__________
Maurer is a shareholder in IBJ Corp., which owns Indianapolis Business Journal. His column appears every other
week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to mmaurer@ibj.com.

















IBJ Conversations
72 Comments
Add Comment
"We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,that amoung these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happieness."
God save our republic from people who want to take these unalienable Rights away.
It's infuriating, disgusting, and hurtful to me that the place my partner and I chose to make a home wants to make us outcasts.
Both my partner and I grew up in Indiana, have post-graduate degrees from Indiana University (one of us from the school that bears your name), and we chose to settle in Indianapolis together for its stable economy, high quality of life, and semi-progressive culture. We both do very well here, own a home, and contribute generously to the tax base and Indiana economy. We never intended to leave... until this year.
We refuse to live in and pay taxes to a state that intends to legislatively strip us of our basic human rights. So while we would love to remain close to our families and while we enjoy relatively easy prosperity and currently have a high quality of life here, we're willing to walk away from all of that to live in a place that embraces us and treats us with the fairness to which every tax payer is entitled. Sadly for Indiana, I think many couples in our situation will do the same thing.
What a destructive force hate is. Its consequences are far-reaching. It betrays humanity. And more practically, it destroys economic prosperity by discouraging people--gay and straight--to think of Indiana as a great place to live, work, and do business. Everyone loses.
All of you moderate Republicans out there - it's time to rise up against the Christian right and tea partiers!! It was my Party and I'll cry if I want to....
Will you ever learn? The ignorant religious right owns your party now. Im sure any purple hat will have to be purchased from an exlusive state subcontractor
a local doctor and nurse lived on the same property over the years. never married always together...did not harm the doctor practice.
this was 60 years ago in a southern indiana town of 4500. so you are gay! big deal
By CHOICE, it's funny. By legislation it's horrific.
Chaplin woulda' done it... I'm just sayin'...
No?
Hmmmmm
Bravo, Mr. Maurer. I'm proud my alma mater bears your name.
Not so long ago we were moaning about sending AMERICAN jobs overseas. I have a better idea - lets just bring the Chinese to the US. They would still be taking American jobs, but then they would be immigrants and our friends. Why enforce immigration at all? Let everyone come in.
Thank you for your courage and common sense.
I wish Mitch had spoken these words.
Thank goodness that our State government is also dictating the K12 educational process now. This will ensure that rouge, freedom loving educators are easily fired so as to never teach children about all types of political and social issues and viewpoints.
Let's hear it for political job security for the GOP and their plan for BIG government!
ALL of these folks have college degrees, Three of them are artists and all were involved with various charity work, political fundraising, arts communities etc. (which is how I came to know them all) and if they feel that way living in Indy, can you imagine what its like to live in the rest of the state?
The sad part is that there are a lot of Hoosiers who will read this and say "don't let the door hit you on the way out" and would love to see all of us "gay folk" move out. Be careful what you wish for.
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak outâ??because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak outâ??because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outâ??because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for meâ??and there was no one left to speak out for me.
I vote we send them back Homosexico!
Hey! The Sikhs wear turbans, the Jews wear yarmulkes, Christians wear crucifixes, soldiers wear uniforms, everyone wears something that identifies them in some way. So the purple hat idea for immigrants is a good idea, but for the gays, I think having them wear makeup and Donna Karen fashion items would more easily incite their enthusiasm for the idea.
I left the state many years ago and now don't even acknowledge I'm from Indiana. The residents haven't changed their attitudes one bit since 1964. It's worse than the old "barefoot and pregnant" adage. A darned shame is what it is.