Menard fires back in court fight with Hilberts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tomisue Hilbert made “spurious” claims that John Menard tried to extort sex from her as a strategy to help her and her husband get a leg up in a business dispute.

That’s the argument that Menard, CEO of hardware store chain Menard Inc., made in an Aug. 27 document filed in answer to a lawsuit filed by Tomisue Hilbert in Hamilton Superior Court.

John Menard Menard

Hilbert’s lawsuit, filed May 29, alleged that Menard pressured her to have sex and, because she refused, he launched a series of legal actions against the company she and her husband, Steve Hilbert, own and manage.

But Menard, 73, has now countersued Tomisue Hilbert for “abuse of process,” saying she filed her lawsuit only after companies controlled by Menard removed the Hilberts as managers of a private equity firm and sued to recover millions of dollars in fees paid to the Hilberts.

“This lawsuit was designed to punish Defendant John Menard Jr. with false and defamatory allegations calculated to inflict maximum personal embarrassment on the Menard family,” wrote Jerry Padgett, an attorney for Menard, in a motion to dismiss the case. He also claimed Hilbert’s lawsuit is designed to “achieve some perceived advantage or leverage” in other cases pending between Menard and the Hilberts.

Tomisue Hilbert, 43, claimed that, during a May 2011 stay at the Hilberts’ home on the Caribbean island of St. Martin, John Menard touched her inappropriately several times and asked her to have a threesome with his wife, Fay.

Menard threatened then and in later conversations that, if Tomisue Hilbert did not have sex with him, there would be “financial consequences,” according to Hilbert’s lawsuit. And now he is simply “bullying” the Hilberts and their friends with a series of lawsuits, said Tomisue Hilbert’s attorney, Linda Pence.

“Menard uses litigation as a tactic to destroy people,” Pence said.

The litigation started in November when Merchant Capital LLC filed suit in Wisconsin against Steve Hilbert. Merchant Capital is the entity created by John Menard to invest in a private equity firm called MH Private Equity.

MH Private Equity was formed in 2005 by the Hilberts and Menard to acquire and invest in businesses. Menard supplied the money and Steve Hilbert the management. Menard owned 80 percent of the firm and the Hilberts owned the other 20 percent.

But after spending $495 million, the companies MH Equity purchased declined in value 70 percent, according to Menard. In addition, Menard and Merchant Capital claim that Steve Hilbert engaged in fraud during the formation of MH Private Equity and in taking nearly $35 million in management fees.

For all those reasons, Menard and Merchant Capital sued in November 2012 to remove Steve and Tomisue Hilbert’s company as the manager of MH Private Equity.

Steve Hilbert, 67, fought back, claiming the companies owned by MH Private Equity were worth far more than Menard claimed and that Merchant Capital had failed to pay all the management fees it had agreed to under contract.

But a judge in Menard’s hometown of Eau Claire, Wis., sided with Menard in February, issuing a temporary injunction against Hilbert. That allowed Merchant Capital to take control of the companies MH Private Equity had purchased, including Indianapolis-based New Sunshine LLC, a suntan lotion firm.

Since taking over in March, Merchant Capital has fired several executives at New Sunshine and filed lawsuits against some of the Hilberts’ friends.

In June, Steve and Tomisue Hilbert’s company, which is called MH Equity Managing Member LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, claiming $10 million in assets and $1.5 million in liabilities.

That move stayed litigation in Wisconsin, where Menard’s attorneys were seeking repayment of $3.7 million in fees the Hilberts were paid last year.

Menard’s attorneys are now seeking to get the bankruptcy case dismissed, arguing that the Hilberts are “forum shopping.”

Before their recent falling out, the Hilberts and Menard had been good friends for two decades, beginning when Steve Hilbert was CEO of Carmel-based insurance giant Conseco Inc. Menard’s filing, however, claims that as far back as 2003, the Hilberts’ interactions with Menard were business “under the guise of socializing.”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............