IBJNews

Metro home-building activity sinks again in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

New-home construction in the Indianapolis area slid in 2011, marking six straight year-over-year declines in residential building activity.

But some industry experts are expressing optimism that the market could be ready to turn a corner. Last year's 3-percent decrease in building permits filed in the nine-county metropolitan area represented the smallest year-over-year drop since local home-building activity began to decline in 2006.

Steve Lains, CEO of the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis, said he's more positive about 2012, particularly since last year’s building activity nearly matched that of 2010, when the sector received a huge lift from generous federal tax credits.

“The demand has come back maybe better than we anticipated,” he said. “Moving into 2012, there’s a lot of optimism about the marketplace.”

Still, the number of new homes built in the metro area last year was the smallest since the residential market began slumping six years ago.

In the nine-county area last year, the number of home-construction permits dropped to 3,614, about 62 percent fewer than in 2006 and a whopping 76 percent fewer than the 15,054 posted in 2001, the most active year for local home building in the new century.

The number of building permits filed in Marion County fell 17 percent, to 607 in 2011 from 729 in 2010. June was the most active month, when builders filed 85 permits.

Building in Marion County could increase in 2012, though, if plans by Columbus, Ohio-based M/I Homes to construct more houses in two developments are any indication.

The Metropolitan Development Commission’s division of planning is set on Wednesday afternoon to give the builder the go-ahead to plat 74 lots at the Marlin Meadows subdivision on the city’s southeast side and another 19 lots at the Rosswood subdivision on the far-east side.

M/I Homes is under contract to purchase property in Marlin Meadows on East Thompson Road from Indiana Bank & Trust Co., which repossessed the land from defunct builder Hansen & Horn Group Inc.

Hansen & Horn built 56 homes at the development before it went bankrupt in 2010, and M/I Homes ultimately could build the remainder at the 222-lot subdivision.

“We’re actually looking forward to 2012,” said Mark Connor, M/I Homes’ vice president of land acquisition. “We’re thinking the market is going to stay relatively flat. But we intend to be actively building in more neighborhoods than we did in 2011.”

M/I Homes is building in about 20 developments in the Indianapolis area and hopes to increase its activity by 30 percent to 40 percent from the roughly 200 building permits it filed in the area in 2011.

Lains at BAGI, meanwhile, expects new-home prices to increase in 2012 as builders deplete the inventory of unfinished developments left by bankrupt builders.

“Those discounted lots mostly are all gone,” he said. “Now you have builders developing new lots. Those new lots are going to be at a higher price.”

Overall, home builders were most active last year in Hamilton County, where they filed 1,413 permits, an uptick of 4 percent from 2010.

The number of permits filed in 2011 decreased 8 percent in Hendricks County but increased 7 percent in Johnson County. Boone County registered a slight 1-percent gain.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT