Metro home-building activity sinks again in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New-home construction in the Indianapolis area slid in 2011, marking six straight year-over-year declines in residential building activity.

But some industry experts are expressing optimism that the market could be ready to turn a corner. Last year's 3-percent decrease in building permits filed in the nine-county metropolitan area represented the smallest year-over-year drop since local home-building activity began to decline in 2006.

Steve Lains, CEO of the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis, said he's more positive about 2012, particularly since last year’s building activity nearly matched that of 2010, when the sector received a huge lift from generous federal tax credits.

“The demand has come back maybe better than we anticipated,” he said. “Moving into 2012, there’s a lot of optimism about the marketplace.”

Still, the number of new homes built in the metro area last year was the smallest since the residential market began slumping six years ago.

In the nine-county area last year, the number of home-construction permits dropped to 3,614, about 62 percent fewer than in 2006 and a whopping 76 percent fewer than the 15,054 posted in 2001, the most active year for local home building in the new century.

The number of building permits filed in Marion County fell 17 percent, to 607 in 2011 from 729 in 2010. June was the most active month, when builders filed 85 permits.

Building in Marion County could increase in 2012, though, if plans by Columbus, Ohio-based M/I Homes to construct more houses in two developments are any indication.

The Metropolitan Development Commission’s division of planning is set on Wednesday afternoon to give the builder the go-ahead to plat 74 lots at the Marlin Meadows subdivision on the city’s southeast side and another 19 lots at the Rosswood subdivision on the far-east side.

M/I Homes is under contract to purchase property in Marlin Meadows on East Thompson Road from Indiana Bank & Trust Co., which repossessed the land from defunct builder Hansen & Horn Group Inc.

Hansen & Horn built 56 homes at the development before it went bankrupt in 2010, and M/I Homes ultimately could build the remainder at the 222-lot subdivision.

“We’re actually looking forward to 2012,” said Mark Connor, M/I Homes’ vice president of land acquisition. “We’re thinking the market is going to stay relatively flat. But we intend to be actively building in more neighborhoods than we did in 2011.”

M/I Homes is building in about 20 developments in the Indianapolis area and hopes to increase its activity by 30 percent to 40 percent from the roughly 200 building permits it filed in the area in 2011.

Lains at BAGI, meanwhile, expects new-home prices to increase in 2012 as builders deplete the inventory of unfinished developments left by bankrupt builders.

“Those discounted lots mostly are all gone,” he said. “Now you have builders developing new lots. Those new lots are going to be at a higher price.”

Overall, home builders were most active last year in Hamilton County, where they filed 1,413 permits, an uptick of 4 percent from 2010.

The number of permits filed in 2011 decreased 8 percent in Hendricks County but increased 7 percent in Johnson County. Boone County registered a slight 1-percent gain.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.