Missed payments force Emmis to add independent directors

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. has missed dividend payments for six consecutive quarters, putting its preferred stockholders in line to elect two new directors to the company’s board.

The Indianapolis-based media company disclosed the upcoming change in its governance structure Thursday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In a telephone interview Friday morning, Emmis General Counsel and Secretary J. Scott Enright said the company owes its preferred stockholders about $14 million in missed dividends. A missed payment Thursday triggered the board expansion.

Emmis' board currently has eight seats. As a result of its missed dividends, holders of the company's 3 million or so preferred shares have until the end of the day April 26 to nominate candidates to fill two new board positions. Preferred shareholders will vote exclusively on the two seats at Emmis' annual meeting July 14, with one vote per share owned.

Enright said the two candidates who get the most votes will be added to the Emmis board and will serve one-year terms.  Nominees are eligible for consideration so long as their service doesn’t create SEC ownership conflicts. Emmis' corporate governance guidelines prohibit directors from serving on more than six other public company boards; forbid them from holding interest in other broadcasters that would cause Emmis to violate FCC ownership limits; and require them not to be older than 70.

The two new board seats would be eliminated as soon as Emmis becomes current on its dividends, Enright said. The two new directors will receive the same compensation as other board members.

“They’ll be full-fledged members of the board of directors,” Enright said. “They’ll be up for re-election every year until we take care of the dividend arrearage.”

The new directors will have their first opportunity to influence Emmis direction at a board meeting immediately after the company’s annual meeting, Enright said.

Emmis lost $309.2 million in the fiscal year ended Feb. 28, 2009. The company has not yet disclosed full results for its latest fiscal year.


  • It's Gotta be Hell
    No wonder Smulyan tried to go private a few years back; life could've been a lot easier for him if he'd pulled it off, obviously. And $14M isn't exactly chump change, either.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!