Moody's lowers Citizens' credit ratings on $2.6B in bonds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Moody’s Investor Services has lowered Citizens Energy Group’s ratings on more than $2.6 billion in bonds.

The credit rating service has stuck with a “stable” outlook for Citizens’ ability to repay its debts. But an Oct. 3 report cites concerns across all the operations at the Indianapolis-based utility, which is a public trust that operates the city’s gas, steam, water and sewage services.

Among the troublesome issues cited by Moody's: Citizens can’t move cash across its divisions, the utility needs approval from state regulators before changing its rates, and there is “potential exposure to non-traditional municipal finance risks.”

The downgrades to Citizens’ bonds were:

— A1 to A2 on $927.1 million in first-lien revenue bonds for Citizens Water System.
— A2 to A3 on a $42.9 million in second-lien revenue bonds for Citizens Water.
— A1 to A2 on $884.7 million in first-lien revenue bonds for Citizens Wastewater Authority.
— A2 to A3 on $314 million in second-lien revenue bonds for Wastewater Authority.
— A2 to A3 on $125.4 million in bonds for Citizens Thermal Energy Systems.
— Aa3 to A2 on a $51.4 million in bonds for Citizens Gas Utility System.
— A2 to A3 on $291.3 million in bonds for Citizens Gas Distribution Utility System.

Despite the downgrades, Citizens' bond ratings remain in the “upper-medium grade” and “low credit risk” territory, by Moody’s standards. The highest-quality rating for corporate bonds is triple-A The rating levels descend to triple-C as the possibility of default increases, and finally to D, or default.

“We’re certainly disappointed in Moody’s decision to downgrade the company,” said Citizens spokesman Dan Considine, noting that the company maintained A-grades.

A review began in June after Citizens and Evansville-based Vectren Corp. unloaded ProLiance Energy, a financially troubled natural gas marketer they jointly owned, to Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners.

Moody’s began the review to determine if ProLiance, which lost $51 million in 2012, had an effect on Citizens, which held a 39-percent stake.

Exiting the investment was a good thing, said Dan Aschenbach, a senior vice president at Moody’s. But Citizens' “corporate-like” mindset—compared to more conservative strategies used at municipal utilities—carries more risk, he said.

A second review of bonds tied to Citizens Water and Citizens Wastewater bonds also questioned ProLiance’s effects on those divisions. The review determined that there wasn’t a direct effect.

However, Moody's decided that the water and sewage divisions faced other hindrances—enough to lower ratings on their bonds.

The regulated process for changing water rates was a key concern, especially after Citizens in February filed with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to increase water rates 14.7 percent and sewage rates 31.7 percent. The steeper charges were intended to cover infrastructure upgrades.

Most municipal utilities can change rates without state approval. But because Citizens is not owned by the city, it needs to go through the IURC. The process takes longer and could result in rejection. Indiana’s utility consumer office has already suggested slimmer rate increases of 3 percent for water and 25 percent for sewer.

Moody’s held onto a “stable” rating for the wastewater bonds, which will be affected by customers’ abilities to pay the steeper bills, Aschenbach said.

The thermal division, which provides steam heating to customers downtown, has too few customers, Moody's said. Although Citizens has “a strong market position,” the loss of a significant customer could seriously hinder revenue.

A spokeswoman for Citizens did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Moody’s is one of three major credit rating services, the others being Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor's. The latter two have not publicly indicated recently that they would review Citizens.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1