IBJNews

PEARCE: More companies are focusing on consumers with poor credit ratings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The hardest-hitting recession in 75 years has left as many as 70 percent of consumers (many newly credit-challenged) with battered credit scores. However, retailers who approach these customers with sensitivity and integrity can find great opportunity both for themselves and the customers they help get on the road to recovery.

It has been our experience that if you approach this consumer segment with a desire to help them advance and a process for building their credit, one can make an honest, well-earned profit.

These consumers’ credit scores have dropped into what is termed subprime/near-prime status, with Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO) scores at 620 and below. Yet they still need goods and services, but can no longer qualify for traditional financing.

They have had credit cards canceled or limits cut from $10,000 to $500. Many of these are consumers with good incomes who were affected by the demise of the housing market.

Burdened with the need to move for new employment and the inability to sell their home, they face the challenge of not meeting their mortgage obligation. Others dealing with extended unemployment for the first times in their lives are forced to make difficult decisions in determining what bills to pay and which to put off.

The recent flight of financial services from the subprime markets has left a void and a large group of consumers who are severely underserved in their basic human needs. With an ever-increasing market of consumers with credit challenges who find it difficult at best and impossible at worst to find financing for basic need items such as furniture, appliances, cars, living space, financial services and more, there is great opportunity!

Markets that now serve these consumers are highly fragmented, typically unprofessional and sometimes unscrupulous. Therein lies great opportunity—to serve these customers with products in a clean, friendly, professional environment. Doing so can exceed their expectations and drive customer loyalty.

It is important to understand the risks in providing credit to credit-challenged customers.

In reviewing credit bureau reports of hundreds of thousands of consumers in more than 20 years, we at J.D. Byrider have learned one thing: No two are completely alike. Good, honest people of all races, ethnicities and income levels sometimes run into difficulties that affect their credit.

In taking the time to discuss the difficulties that led the customer to the situation of not qualifying for traditional financing, you will find thousands upon thousands of them who desire to repair their damaged credit and are willing to honestly commit (to a company that will offer them goods and services) their best efforts to live up to their obligations.

Large financial institutions suffering from the subprime (and now prime) mortgage meltdown forgot to consider each customer individually and build a long-term relationship with them. They simply underwrote the loan using credit algorithms, securitized the debt, and sold it off to hedge funds and other financial institutions seeking high profits.

It is essential in providing credit to subprime consumers to sit down face-to-face and discuss line-by-line issues on their credit bureau reports and their ability to repay their commitment.

In providing credit and services to consumers who have shown difficulty in meeting financial obligations, it is also important to know that sometimes the answer is no. Taking the time to help them build a realistic budget to ensure they have the ability to repay before extending credit seems like a novel approach but it was a basic fundamental in years gone by. Nothing can replace the experience of looking someone in the eye and building trust.

The recognition of the tremendous opportunity in meeting the needs of these consumers is manifesting itself in the franchising industry as of late. Companies and brands catering directly to these consumers are outpacing many other companies in their respective industry segments.

Check-cashing and financial-service franchise brands are growing. Even Wal-Mart offers financial services to those without traditional banking relationships. Self-finance and rent-to-own brands, such as J.D. Byrider, Aaron’s and ColorTyme, have offered franchised retail outlets providing furniture, electronics, automobiles and appliances for decades.

If approached with careful consideration of the risks and a business model that helps consumers advance, one can find great satisfaction in meeting the needs of these consumers in transition.•
__________

Pearce is vice president of franchise development at J.D. Byrider Systems Inc.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT