PEARCE: More companies are focusing on consumers with poor credit ratings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The hardest-hitting recession in 75 years has left as many as 70 percent of consumers (many newly credit-challenged) with battered credit scores. However, retailers who approach these customers with sensitivity and integrity can find great opportunity both for themselves and the customers they help get on the road to recovery.

It has been our experience that if you approach this consumer segment with a desire to help them advance and a process for building their credit, one can make an honest, well-earned profit.

These consumers’ credit scores have dropped into what is termed subprime/near-prime status, with Fair Isaac Corp. (FICO) scores at 620 and below. Yet they still need goods and services, but can no longer qualify for traditional financing.

They have had credit cards canceled or limits cut from $10,000 to $500. Many of these are consumers with good incomes who were affected by the demise of the housing market.

Burdened with the need to move for new employment and the inability to sell their home, they face the challenge of not meeting their mortgage obligation. Others dealing with extended unemployment for the first times in their lives are forced to make difficult decisions in determining what bills to pay and which to put off.

The recent flight of financial services from the subprime markets has left a void and a large group of consumers who are severely underserved in their basic human needs. With an ever-increasing market of consumers with credit challenges who find it difficult at best and impossible at worst to find financing for basic need items such as furniture, appliances, cars, living space, financial services and more, there is great opportunity!

Markets that now serve these consumers are highly fragmented, typically unprofessional and sometimes unscrupulous. Therein lies great opportunity—to serve these customers with products in a clean, friendly, professional environment. Doing so can exceed their expectations and drive customer loyalty.

It is important to understand the risks in providing credit to credit-challenged customers.

In reviewing credit bureau reports of hundreds of thousands of consumers in more than 20 years, we at J.D. Byrider have learned one thing: No two are completely alike. Good, honest people of all races, ethnicities and income levels sometimes run into difficulties that affect their credit.

In taking the time to discuss the difficulties that led the customer to the situation of not qualifying for traditional financing, you will find thousands upon thousands of them who desire to repair their damaged credit and are willing to honestly commit (to a company that will offer them goods and services) their best efforts to live up to their obligations.

Large financial institutions suffering from the subprime (and now prime) mortgage meltdown forgot to consider each customer individually and build a long-term relationship with them. They simply underwrote the loan using credit algorithms, securitized the debt, and sold it off to hedge funds and other financial institutions seeking high profits.

It is essential in providing credit to subprime consumers to sit down face-to-face and discuss line-by-line issues on their credit bureau reports and their ability to repay their commitment.

In providing credit and services to consumers who have shown difficulty in meeting financial obligations, it is also important to know that sometimes the answer is no. Taking the time to help them build a realistic budget to ensure they have the ability to repay before extending credit seems like a novel approach but it was a basic fundamental in years gone by. Nothing can replace the experience of looking someone in the eye and building trust.

The recognition of the tremendous opportunity in meeting the needs of these consumers is manifesting itself in the franchising industry as of late. Companies and brands catering directly to these consumers are outpacing many other companies in their respective industry segments.

Check-cashing and financial-service franchise brands are growing. Even Wal-Mart offers financial services to those without traditional banking relationships. Self-finance and rent-to-own brands, such as J.D. Byrider, Aaron’s and ColorTyme, have offered franchised retail outlets providing furniture, electronics, automobiles and appliances for decades.

If approached with careful consideration of the risks and a business model that helps consumers advance, one can find great satisfaction in meeting the needs of these consumers in transition.•

Pearce is vice president of franchise development at J.D. Byrider Systems Inc.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.