IBJNews

More demand for mall space boosts Simon earnings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. mall owner, reported an increase in first-quarter funds from operations and raised its FFO forecast for the year as retailers sought more space in regional shopping centers.

FFO, which gauges a property company’s ability to generate cash, climbed to $741.9 million, or $2.05 a share, from $648.7 million, or $1.82, a year earlier, the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust said Friday in a statement. That compares with a $2.01-a-share average of 21 analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Demand for mall space is rising, helping increase revenue at Simon. Vacancies at major malls fell to 8.3 percent in the first quarter from 9 percent a year earlier, and rents rose to $39.46 a square foot from $39, New York-based research firm Reis Inc. said earlier this month. Simon is the biggest U.S. owner of both regional malls and outlet centers, where retailers sell at a discount.

“There’s more demand for good quality mall space than there is supply,” John Sheehan, an analyst at Edward Jones in St. Louis, said Friday morning. “If the whole group is improving, that should bode well for the largest mall landlord in America.”

Revenue increased 8.6 percent from a year earlier to $1.22 billion. Occupancies at Simon’s U.S. properties climbed to 94.7 percent from 93.6 percent. The base minimum rent in the first quarter was $41.05 a square foot, up from $39.87. Tenant sales rose 5.3 percent to $575 a square foot.

The company raised its estimate of FFO for the year to $8.50 to $8.60 a share, up from a February forecast of $8.40 to $8.50 a share. The average of 22 analyst estimates is $8.59.

First-quarter results were announced before the start of regular U.S. trading. Simon fell 0.5 percent to $176.01 on Thursday. The shares have advanced 15 percent in 12 months, compared with a 14 percent gain for the Bloomberg REIT Index.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

ADVERTISEMENT