IBJNews

More layoffs, furloughs possible for cash-strapped CIB

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The financial condition of the city’s Capital Improvement Board, though improving, is still dire enough that employees of the Indiana Convention Center could be subjected to more unpaid furloughs or layoffs.

“We are looking at it,” CIB Executive Director Barney Levengood said today of possible employment cuts. “It’s under consideration.”

Besides the convention center, the CIB operates Conseco Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium, and has dramatically cut spending in order to balance its budget. The City-County Council is set to approve the CIB’s $63 million budget for fiscal year 2010 at its Sept. 21 meeting.

Levengood’s comments followed questions from Kim Nicely, a sound and light department technician at the convention center, who said “it appears to the public that the only contract the CIB will honor is the Colts contract.”

The not-for-profit has struggled to close a funding shortfall largely due to the additional $20 million required annually to operate Lucas Oil Stadium, which is much larger than the RCA Dome it replaced.

The CIB early this year saved $1.1 million by slashing personnel costs. That included $615,000 in salary for 15 vacant administrative and supervisory positions that were not filled, and nearly $500,000 in temporary help and hourly employee pay through attrition and reduced overtime. Further, it required all salaried employees to take one furlough day per pay period in April, May and June—a total of six unpaid days.

Privatizing certain operations of Lucas Oil Stadium and the convention center could result in even more cost savings. The city is putting our requests for information to determine whether such a move would make sense.

“It’s an option people are looking at,” CIB President Bob Grand acknowledged. “We feel confident we’re operating [the facilities] pretty well, but we’re willing to take a look at it.”

The CIB has cut roughly $10 million from its budget while struggling much of the year to close a projected $47 million deficit for 2010. Legislators authorized the City-County Council to raise the local hotel tax from 9 percent to 10 percent, which would generate roughly $4 million annually. Another $8 million would be generated by expanding the Professional Sports Development Area to include the new J.W. Marriott hotel.

In addition, the CIB will receive $21 million—$9 million in annual loans the state will provide for three years—to help close the gap. The CIB is expected to draft the paperwork by Sept. 21 and submit it by Oct. 31. The CIB would begin paying on the 10-year loan with an interest rate of 6.25 percent in 2013. If the loan goes through, the CIB doubts it will need to dip into its $26 million cash reserve.

“We hope those dollars will be freed up to get some breathing room,” Grand said. “We understand that financial challenges remain, but we hope to can convey a sense of positive [news].”

A part of the cash reserve could help the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association promote the city and an expanded convention center. The addition to the convention center will be finished late next year. The ICVA had requested $5 million in extra marketing dollars this year from the CIB but was rejected.

The CIB also continues to contend with the Indiana Pacers and the expectation that the CIB will pay $15 million next year in Fieldhouse operating costs. A contract provision allows the Pacers to renegotiate its lease after 10 years if the team is losing money. The team contends it has lost money every year but one since moving into the facility.

Pat Early, who heads the CIB’s compensation committee, said members continue to discuss the issue with the Pacers, although no serious negotiations have ensued. “We continue to explore the magnitude of the problem,” Early said. “There’s been no progress, just open discussion.” Early assured CIB members that the Pacers are not considering terminating their 20-year lease with the city.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • This would be solved if the Colts would be a good corporate citizen and see they are killing the golden goose.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT