More making jump to lobbying without cooling-off period

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As part of its pitch to represent Indiana's microbreweries, a powerful lobbying group proposed hiring an executive director with business smarts, knowledge of alcohol laws and who currently works for the same government he would be trying to persuade.

It's hardly uncommon to go from being employed by Indiana's government to lobbying it, but an increasing number are making the jump without sitting out the customary one-year "cooling-off" period.

Davey Neal, chief of staff to Secretary of State Connie Lawson, was granted a waiver Thursday allowing him to become a lobbyist almost immediately, should his perspective employer, The Corydon Group, land its $171,000-a-year contract with the brewers.

Corydon Group officials made their pitch to the Brewers of Indiana Guild in a March 4, 2013, business plan obtained by The Associated Press. Neal followed up with the brewers two months later, touting his expertise with other members of the lobbying powerhouse, according to a person who attended the meeting but requested anonymity to discuss the contents of a private meeting.

Neal "as an attorney and a MBA, is perfectly suited to lead (Brewers of Indiana Guild) BIG's external affairs," the lobby shop wrote in the proposal.

Neal said the brewers guild first approached him about helping and said he followed all proper ethics rules in seeking the new job.

"I am pleased to have received unanimous confirmation that I may move forward with further discussions," Neal said Thursday, in response to emailed questions.

His potential move raises questions about the effectiveness of that law at a time when a rising number of former state officials are being granted waivers from the cooling-off period. In the last year, a handful of top state officials have received approval to leap directly from government work to outside employment, including former Gov. Mitch Daniels, who became Purdue University's president in January.

The ethics commission cleared a trio of Daniels' top aides to leave state jobs overseeing Indiana's transportation, economic development and government facilities departments to take jobs with Daniels at Purdue with no waiting period. A top Pence administration official also was cleared to return to an Indianapolis law firm after six months with the new governor but returned to Pence's office roughly a month later.

In each case, the state's ethics panel pointed out the law does not apply to their situations, largely because they would not be directly working on projects or programs they worked on while in state government. But government ethicists say the cozy relationships still raise other questions of favoritism.

Stuart Yoak, executive director of the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions at Indiana University, said he would be concerned about Neal potentially misusing his government position or improperly relying on his insider knowledge of government to get hired.

Corydon Group managing partner Chris Gibson wrote in an email response to a phone call that there had been "no formal negotiations" with Neal and that all conversations with him regarding the job were "prospective in nature."

But according to the business plan obtained by the AP, Neal would be hired as a vice president for the firm if it wins the brewers guild contract. He also would serve as executive director for the guild.

The guild expects to take up the proposal when it meets next Wednesday.

The case offers a rare look inside the cozy relationship between Indiana's publicly paid staffers and the lobby shops they often depart for after working for the state.

The brewers group represents Sun King Brewing Co. in Indianapolis, Three Floyds Brewing Co. in northwest Indiana and 17 other brewers. The lobby shop noted in its business plan that Neal previously worked as executive secretary for Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission, where he "advised the Commission on all manner of legal concerns and provided legal interpretations for the alcohol industry."

The Ethics Commission ruled Thursday that Neal's previous work on the alcohol commission should keep him from lobbying executive branch employees for a year. But the panel didn't bar him from plying lawmakers immediately and approved his move to the lobbying group.

Clay Robinson, owner of Sun King Brewing, told the AP in an email Thursday that he met Neal at a Wabash College alumni event last summer and was impressed with his knowledge of Indiana alcohol laws. He said he approached Neal about helping the guild transition from a loosely structured group to a "bona fide trade organization" and that Neal then approached The Corydon Group.

Robinson said The Corydon Group proposal is one of several the brewers guild is considering. He said he had no concerns about Neal's involvement in the proposal while working for the state.

"I don't see where anything that has transpired would constitute a breach of ethics and it appears that the ethics committee agrees," he said.

Ted Miller, vice president of the guild, noted the craft brewing industry has been growing rapidly in Indiana and, as a result, members have been looking at increasing their influence at the Statehouse.

"The industry is growing at a breakneck pace. So we'd like to make sure the legislation follows that, but they don't work quite that fast down there," Miller said.


  • Waste of time
    Reviewing this matter is a colossal waste of time. The matter will be forgotten in two weeks.
  • Curious
    How many waivers are granted, how many denied, who gets them, and who doesn't? Do regular state employees receive these waivers at the same rate as political appointees? Only a cynic would suggest that there's a difference between the two groups.
  • More of the Same
    Nothing new here. The Good Ole Boy BS has forever been ingrained in American politics...just more so here in Indiana maybe. Add this to President Obama opting Congress out of Obamacare and we get a clear picture of what our once great country isn't!
  • What Problem?
    I don't see where this is an issue. Isn't this the same commission that cleared Scott Storms going to work for Duke... That has proved to be a win-win-win for Duke, us Duke ratepayers and ol' Stormy himself. I don't understand this giant mistrust of the good ole boy state govt network of My-Man-Mitch. Yo, Mike (Pence), I’m kinda hoping you’re trying to change things around down there... So it seems time to step in and straighten out this Ethics panel…. CLEAN HOUSE. And while you're at it, might want to change your Legislative Director before she gets you in too deep. “Oh crap!” she already has. As long as I’m rambling, how about the IURC… It’s a joke they have allowed Duke to call their plant operational, when it has been off-line more than on-line… And on-line is using NATURAL GAS to generate power, not coal. But I digress.
  • Banana Republic
    Well there is no need for an Ethics Commission. The IAG and Inspector General should quite simply prosecute any case where a senior staff VIOLATES the cooling off period. As a condition to employment in State Governement at Senior Leadership levels those individuals will be required to pay back their annual salary x 3 as a violation of the cooling off period. Additionally, if there guilty of any wrongdoing federal prosecutors can and should prosecute them. Indiana = Banana Republic

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing