More than 1,300 ISTEP test results to be tossed

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

When ISTEP scores are released next week, parents and teachers will be able to easily identify whether a student’s exam was interrupted during last spring’s testing period and whether the results are valid.

In all, the scores for 1,388 tests will be invalidated, said Daniel Altman, a spokesman for the Department of Education.

Those students still will receive some results but their exam reports will make clear the results are tainted, state Superintendent Glenda Ritz said Wednesday.

Ritz said she wants parents and teachers to have as much information as possible so they can analyze the results of the ISTEP, which is used to measure student achievement and growth in elementary, middle and high schools. The results are also used to grade schools and adjust teacher pay.

The Department of Education has created three different types of ISTEP reports, Ritz said. Students will receive one of the three:

-       A report that provides ISTEP scores and indicates that the student did not suffer any interruptions in testing.

-       A report that provides the scores and indicates an interruption took place but says the scores were determined to be valid.

-       A report that provides scores or partial scores, indicates an interruption took place and says the problems led the results to be invalidated.

“I have insisted all score information be reported,” Ritz told the State Board of Education on Wednesday. “Normally, someone with an invalidated score gets nothing. I did not want that to happen. I thought quite a bit of the information” was important.

Last spring, server problems at CTB/McGraw-Hill – which administers the test – led to problems for the computer-based exam. Some students were kicked out of the test or had to pause in the middle of an exam. Some had to start their tests over and the state was forced to expand the testing window to ensure that all students had an opportunity to complete the exams.

In all, about 78,000 students suffered testing interruptions, although an independent analysis found the problems did not have a measurable negative impact on statewide scores. Still, Richard Hill, co-founder of the New Hampshire-based National Center for the Improvement of Education Assessment, said the problems could have affected individual students.

The Department of Education delayed releasing the ISTEP results as officials investigated the problem.

In July, officials said that scores for math increased in grades three, four, five, seven and eight from 2012 to 2013, with math scores decreasing over that same period only in sixth grade. Grades four, five and eight saw an increase in English scores, with scores for grade six remaining the same and scores in grades three and seven decreasing.

But the scores for individual students and school districts have not been released. Ritz said that will take place next week, with online data available Monday.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!