MORRIS: Legal Aid Society deserves your support

Greg Morris
July 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

MorrisI would like to introduce you to a worthwhile organization you might not be familiar with. It’s the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society. In the interest of full disclosure, I recently joined its board, but that gives me an intimate inside look at the operation.

Very simply, the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society operates as a civil law firm for the poor in central Indiana. This low-income population would not be able to afford much-needed legal assistance without the help of an organization like ILAS.

Serving since 1941, the society is the only organization in central Indiana where a low-income client can sit down with a highly qualified attorney immediately, or within one to two days of requesting consultation, to discuss a civil legal question, and pay no attorney’s fees.

It was the first organization of its kind in the state, and it has operated continuously since its incorporation, compiling a record of continued growth and provision of quality civil legal assistance.

Today, it’s the largest organization in Indiana devoted solely to the non-ideological, non-sectarian, non-governmental provision of civil legal assistance to persons of limited means. Many of the society’s clients have issues that involve family law, and a significant number of cases involve bankruptcy, housing, property, debt, and a host of other miscellaneous issues.

Among the family issues the organization handles are adoption, paternity, visitation, guardianship, support, custody and divorce. The majority of the legal issues involve the interests of women, children and the elderly—women in need of protective orders for themselves and their children, couples wishing to adopt, elderly individuals wishing to resolve housing issues so they can remain in their own home, and grandparents wishing to properly care for their grandchildren through guardianships. ILAS does not handle fee-generating cases or criminal matters.

Huge obstacles are removed when any of these legal issues are resolved. Family members are able to move on with their lives—without fear and uncertainty—and to become more productive.

Many clients also have non-legal problems. The society’s attorneys are trained to evaluate such problems and to refer clients to appropriate social service agencies, which are usually other United Way affiliates.

The society’s service area consists of Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Morgan and Shelby counties. Services are available to individuals and families with incomes of less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level guidelines. According to the 2010 census, more than 200,000 people would qualify for this service in central Indiana.

The society’s staff of seven full-time lawyers and one part time, together with scores of volunteers, annually screen more than 15,000 inquiries, and competently counsel and represent about 8,000 low-income clients. The society’s lawyers are in court an average of three times per day.

John Floreancig, general counsel, explains: “We are truly a law firm for the poor. And in that I mean that we operate like any law firm of the city of Indianapolis would, with the exception that we don’t charge fees for our services. In my opinion, it’s the only way to serve a low-income client.”

I asked Floreancig to give me an example of a recent case and the outcome obtained for the client. “When their father was convicted of abuse of one of their children, our client [the mother] needed an immediate modification of custody to keep the children out of foster care in a Washington State Juvenile Court action,” he said. “We were able to act, on an emergency basis, to coordinate all parties and courts and to prepare the necessary documents for modification of the children’s custody in a matter of days. Both courts accepted the documents and the children were safely placed in their mother’s custody.”

This is just one example of hundreds of cases handled each year by ILAS. If you want to help the organization in any way, by donating either your time or treasure, contact Floreancig at 635-9538.•


Morris is publisher of IBJ. His column appears every other week. To comment on this column, send e-mail to gmorris@ibj.com.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.