IBJNews

Mourdock will keep energy stocks if elected to Senate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock has no plans to divest his energy-centric stock holdings if he’s elected to the U.S. Senate.

Mourdock, who is challenging Republican Sen. Richard Lugar in the May 8 primary, held six different energy-related stocks last year, according to his most recent filing with the Indiana Inspector General.

The stocks, all worth at least $10,000, were Exxon Mobile Corp., Occidental Petroleum Corp., Spectra Energy Corp., Vectren Corp., Duke Energy Corp. and Apache Corp.

It’s common for members of Congress to own individual stocks. In fact, the financial rewards they have reaped through immunity from insider-trading laws drove passage earlier this month of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which ends that privilege and requires major transactions to be reported within 45 days.

“We’ve documented that members of Congress are active traders in the stock market,” said Craig Holman, government-affairs lobbyist at the left-leaning consumer advocacy group Public Citizen in Washington, D.C. “They’re most active in industries where they have oversight.”

Indiana’s senators have very different profiles when it comes to publicly traded investments.

Lugar’s only publicly traded stocks are mutual funds, a practice that goes back to the beginning of his public-service career as mayor of Indianapolis, spokesman Andy Fisher said. Other assets he reported to the U.S. Senate in 2010 included a stake in the Lugar family farm.

The Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan research group, estimates Lugar’s net worth at $283,000 to $1 million, based on his personal finance disclosure with the U.S. Senate.

Sen. Dan Coats, whose net worth is estimated at $2.8 million to $6.8 million, held stock in 10 companies, plus options for Allison Transmission Holdings Inc. in 2010. Coats’ holdings represented a range of industries.

A geologist from Vanderburgh County who has been treasurer since 2007, Mourdock is the most active stock investor among state agency chiefs. The only other stock reported by his colleagues last year was Eli Lilly and Co., held by Lt. Gov. Becky Skillman and Attorney General Greg Zoeller, who noted that he received it as a bequest from his father-in-law. (Gov. Mitch Daniels' publicly traded assets are held in a blind trust.)

Mourdock declined through his spokesman to talk about his stock holdings, or how he might handle potential conflicts of interest as a senator.

“Most of the investments held by Mr. Mourdock consist of publicly traded stocks in large companies as well as various mutual funds,” spokesman Chris Conner said in an e-mail. “Treasurer Mourdock has complied with state ethics rules in disclosing these investments and avoiding any conflicts and will comply with any Senate ethics rules regarding these investments if elected to the Senate.”

Mourdock owned individual company stocks worth $235,000 to $750,000 in 2010, according to his disclosure to the Senate. That didn't include mutual funds, bank accounts and other private assets, such as a royalty interest in 2,800 acres, which he listed as worth less than $1,000.

Lugar’s campaign is raising questions about two holdings that Mourdock didn’t disclose with in his state filing. Mourdock owns shares of Global Energy Inc., a private firm, and USA Synthetic Fuel Corp.

The related firms, both based in Cincinnati, develop coal and coke gasification plants. A Global Energy subsidiary owns the Wabash River Plant near Terre Haute, while USA Synthetic is behind a stalled project in Lima, Ohio.

Mourdock’s personal finance disclosure to the Senate says the shares, combined, were worth $150,000 to $350,000 in 2010.

Fisher, Lugar’s spokesman, said Mourdock didn’t “properly disclose” those holdings to Indiana, which requires disclosure of any stock worth $10,000 or more. (The disclosure is the subject of a citizen’s ethics complaint.)

“Was there some reason he did not properly disclose some of the companies?” Fisher asked. He noted that Global Energy and USA Synthetic would benefit from cap-and-trade emissions regulations, “which would be contrary to the views he’s been expressing as a conservative.”

Conner said there are good reasons Mourdock didn’t include the synthetic fuels firms on his Indiana disclosure. By the 2011 reporting period, his USA Synthetic stock wasn’t marketable, and its value later fell below the state’s $10,000 value threshold, he said.

Mourdock received shares of Global Energy in 2005 in exchange for consulting work for which the company couldn’t pay, Conner said. In 2010, he and other Global Energy shareholders received USA Synthetic shares in an exchange that was part of USA Synthetic's going public. The company, which is traded over-the-counter, went public through a reverse merger.

It's impossible to say exactly what Mourdock's current stock holdings are, or their value. Indiana requires officials to report stocks held at any time during the year and does not ask for an estimated value.

Mourdock reported that he held shares of Baxter International, Eli Lilly and Co., Fedex Corp. and Proctor and Gamble in 2011, but Conner said he sold “several” of his non-energy stocks last August because he was concerned about market volatility.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hey Gregg
    I am still trying to figure out how Mourdock misplaced several hundred million dollars of our state's revenue. While term limits make sense, I fear that sending Mourdock to Washington might be worse.
  • Lugar
    This article reads as though Lugar is a Saint. I doubt it. There should be term limits!!! These people get more and more corrupt the longer they are in office.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT