IBJNews

N.C. regulators clear hurdle to Duke-Progress merger

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

North Carolina utilities regulators on Friday approved the long-planned takeover of Progress Energy by Duke Energy, clearing the last major hurdle to creating the largest American electric company.

The combined company will serve about 3 million customers in North Carolina and 4 million more in Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Florida and South Carolina. South Carolina regulators still must approve the merged company's plan for operating its combined electrical generation system, but they are not weighing in on the merger. They have scheduled a meeting Monday.

The deal initially valued at $13.7 billion will give it the most customers, power capacity and market value in the U.S.

"This is a blockbuster. It creates a very large entity that should be pretty stable," said Steve Piper, an energy consultant at SNL Energy.

The company led by Charlotte-based Duke Energy will be able to borrow money more cheaply as it sheds more coal-burning power plants, builds facilities able to burn cheaper natural gas, and considers more investment in nuclear energy, Piper said. If the Southeast is able to return to heady economic growth rates that preceded the recession, the combined company can maintain stable and even declining power rates, he said.

Raleigh-based Progress also operates in heavily regulated states and has been more protected from the recent decrease in wholesale power prices than Duke, which operates in deregulated states like Ohio.

Regulators saw the deal as the best possible in an environment of energy industry consolidation, North Carolina Utilities Commission chairman Edward Finley Jr. said.

"It seems far preferable for Progress Energy to merge with North Carolina-headquartered Duke Energy than with a company in another state," he said.

Conditions North Carolina regulators placed on the deal include the combined company passing along at least $650 million in savings to state customers. The merger also is expected to result in operating efficiencies that will mean lower future rate increases, the commission said.

Any costs related to completing the merger can't be passed on to North Carolina utility customers, the commission said. That includes severance costs of about $230 million as Duke and Progress shed up to 1,900 jobs.

The combined company will depend on borrowing for its plant updates. The need for lower borrowing costs was also behind Exelon Corp.'s $7.9 billion takeover of Constellation Energy Group earlier this year, said Phil Adams, a senior bond analyst at Gimme Credit LLC, which provides the financial industry with independent research into corporate bond borrowing.

"We have a very fragmented utilities industry in this country and when you're making multi-billion-dollar capital decisions for assets that are expected to be used for the next 35 to 40 years, bigger is better. It helps your access to capital markets," Adams said.

There are significant challenges facing the combined company, Adams said. They include coping with the costs of a shutdown at Progress Energy's Crystal River nuclear plant in Florida, $1.3 billion in cost overruns at a Duke coal-gasification plant in Indiana, and Ohio's deregulated market, Adams said.

The merger announced in January 2011 has been approved by a series of state and federal agencies, the most significant coming earlier this month when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission gave its blessing. The FERC twice rejected the merger because of concerns it would reduce competition for wholesale electricity in the Carolinas.

Duke Energy says it plans a reverse stock split once it completes its Progress purchase, giving shareholders one share in the expanded company for every three shares they now own. The stock price for each share will triple, so that the overall value of the shares remains the same.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT