IBJNews

NASDAQ threatens to delist Emmis stock

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

NASDAQ has notified Emmis Communications Corp. that it is in danger of being delisted if the company’s stock doesn’t rise above the minimum bid price of $1 per share within the next six months.

Shares of the Indianapolis-based media company, which closed Friday at 90 cents apiece, haven’t traded above $1 since September 2008.

NASDAQ suspended its minimum-stock-price requirement rule last fall after financial markets tanked, but reinstated the rule Aug. 3. It put Emmis on notice Sept. 15 because its stock had traded below the benchmark for at least 30 consecutive business days. 

In order to regain compliance, Emmis stock must trade above the $1 per share minimum bid price for 10 consecutive business days before March 15, or face delisting.

Emmis can appeal any decision to delist its shares, the company said.

“The company intends to actively evaluate and monitor the bid price for its Class A common stock between now and March 15, 2010, and consider implementation of various options available to the company if its Class A common stock does not trade at a level that is likely to regain compliance,” Emmis said in a written statement issued Friday.

At the company’s July 14 annual meeting, Emmis executives confirmed they were considering one strategy to raise their stock price–executing a reverse stock split.

A reverse split may help the company avoid a delisting because each share would be worth more, but it wouldn't make investors any richer, since the total value of their stock would remain unchanged. In a one-for-20 reverse split, for instance, an investor holding 100 shares valued at 25 cents apiece would end up with five shares valued at $5 each.

Emmis has faced financial difficulties recently. It reported a quarterly profit in July, but only after buying back a big chunk of its own debt on the cheap. The company turned a profit of $7.5 million for the fiscal first quarter ended May 31, compared with a loss of $1 million a year earlier.

Revenue, however, dropped from $85.3 million to $62.4 million.

In the latest fiscal year ended Feb. 28, Emmis lost $283.9 million, or $7.81 per share.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Even though I am sure they will pull some parliamentary tricks to get their stock above $1.00 for 10 straight business days, and the way they run their shop with arrogance, they get what they deserve. WIBC which was once the stalwart in the ratings book, has now under the guidance of Kent Sterling, become a laughing stock. They may actually be making more money, but the product sucks and that is what matters to the listener. When you continually hire straight out of college kids, and pay them $9.00/hr, you get what you deserve. How about hiring some truly professional radio guys? Well what do I know anyway, I don't go on any EMMIS stations and suck up like Anthony Schoettle does. He still hasn't written an article about the ratings that took place back in mid Summer...what biased journalist.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT