IBJNews

National Wine inks merger deal with Dallas wholesaler

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based National Wine & Spirits Inc. is joining forces with an out-of-state wholesale beverage distributor, presumably to better compete against a rival that won a bitter battle to sell liquor in Indiana.

National announced Wednesday morning that it will become Republic National Distributing Co. of Indiana after Dallas-based Republic National completes the purchase of “certain assets” of National.

Terms were not announced, but both companies are portraying the deal as an equal partnership.

The acquisition follows a November ruling from the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission to drop its opposition to Miami-based Southern Wine & Spirits of America Inc.’s request to distribute alcohol in Indiana.  

Even though National controls nearly 60 percent of the Indiana market, it is one-tenth the size of Southern. Southern holds distribution agreements with alcohol manufacturers in 29 states, an advantage that National fears it will leverage to steal away its Indiana contracts.

National should benefit from Republic’s size. It is the second-biggest distributor of premium wine and spirits in the country, with operations in 18 states and Washington, D.C., according to the company’s Web site.  
 
National distributes wine and spirits in Indiana and Michigan, and employs more than 1,000 people in the two states. Republic will have about 7,000 employees following the deal with National.

Phone calls to National seeking comment on the deal were not immediately returned. But, in a written release, National Owner and Chairman Jim LaCrosse said Republic emerged, after a careful review of options, as the clear choice with whom to partner.

“[Republic] has a reputation for its integrity and its commitment to excellence in sales and customer service,” LaCrosse said. “Our combined organizations will ensure our new company will continue to grow.”

LaCrosse has called Southern “the 800-pound gorilla,” warning the commission that Southern would drive his company out of business in Indiana.

The commission’s decision to drop its opposition to Southern was surprising. Its unanimous ruling in favor of Southern reversed two previous rulings—also made unanimously—that denied Southern’s application for permits.

In 2008, the commission turned Southern away because the owners of the company dwell outside Indiana. That residency restriction, however, was effectively nixed in a Sept. 14 opinion by the Indiana Attorney General’s Office.

The next day, the commission denied Southern again, this time citing anticompetitive behavior in other states.

As part of its agreement with Republic, National announced Chief Operating Officer John Baker will remain in that position under the new structure.

Baker said in the announcement that the transaction will close as soon as the licensing process is completed.

The two companies had been in discussions for several months, Republic President Tom Cole said.

“The addition of Indiana to our organization continues to underscore our commitment to build [Republic] into the best network of wine and spirits wholesalers in America,” Cole said in the release.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • simonnovolios
    i wannt to ask the facebook whay the peopel to have more wep in facebook or twiter i wannt new wep the naem simonovomios if y wannt to anther action to inviteé more peopel to go any place or contrey or plade and good thienk s to the comments
  • simonnovolios
    i wannt to ask the facebook whay the peopel to have more wep in facebook or twiter i wannt new wep the naem simonovomios if y wannt to anther action to inviteé more peopel to go any place or contrey or plade and good thienk s to the comments
  • you need to hush
    you old bitch liq store whore u are.
  • It's about time Jack
    Jack, you need to check prices in the surrounding states. Why do you think package store business is so good in towns along Indiana borders? Southern will have to raise prices in Indiana to make the other states happy. NWS has done a lot for the state, than a Miami based company will ever do.
  • National & Republic
    If this is supposed to be such a great move for National Wine and Spirits, why did the majority of people in South Bend lose their jobs? And why did the employees of National have to learn of the merger thru the media. To this date National has not released any statement officially to employees of this location however they did come in and state that the entire night shift and several drivers had a week left to work after years of service. Great move National and Republic National for making your pockets a little heavier in an already repressed economy located in the heart of the RV Industry.
  • Beer Barons Take Over
    Don't forget Bayh passing the "beer baron" law that allowed these exclusive distribution deals.

    This was before all of the countries major beer producers were foreign owned.

    Time to repeal the law.
  • ignorance
    You all actually think prices would go DOWN as a result of another out of state wholesaler coming in and closing down National? On the contrary, they would go up. And, retailers ARE free to buy from any wholesaler. IN THE STATE, according to laws in every state including Indiana. If you want more federal control of your life and business than already exists, do feel free to urge your elected rep(s) to change the laws....
  • It's about time!
    It's about time National and Olinger were smacked down. Their controlling and manipulative business practices have been at the expense of Hoosiers who used to enjoy the lowest prices in the area (Illinois; Ohio; Michigan and Kentucky). Perhaps this will even open the door to a broader selection of wines both US and foreign. Past practices and political favoritism were truly restraint of trade and it's time Indiana was bereft of that.
  • Prices
    If you are paying $28 for a case of Bud then you are doing something wrong. So how much to sell a bottle of beer for? My guess is 2 to 4 times what you pay for it. Consumers should be the ones complaining about prices.
  • Why
    Comment was pertaining to restaurants and bars.
  • Why?
    Not only do they not let anyone sell, only one distributor can sell any given item. If I want Crown I have to buy from National. If I want Madori, I have to buy from Olinger and so on. It is also illegal for me to buy from anyone but a distributor. If Bud is on sale at Kroger for $12.00 a case, I have to pay $28 through whatever distributor carries that product.
    • Why?
      Why is our state still doing business like this? Any wholesaler should be able to sell to IN retailers. We shouldn't be subject to the whims of some state-mandated oligopoly.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

      2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

      3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

      4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

      5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

      ADVERTISEMENT