NCAA restoring some of Penn State's football scholarships

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Penn State University’s football program next season will get back five football scholarships that had been stripped in the Jerry Sandusky child sex-abuse scandal.

The Indianapolis-based National Collegiate Athletic Association said in a statement Tuesday that the university had made “continued progress toward ensuring athletics integrity” in the aftermath of the Sandusky case.

The NCAA said that while other penalties would remain in place, it might consider “additional mitigation” in the four- year postseason game ban placed on the Nittany Lions. The original punishment included annual reductions of 20 scholarships for four years, and the NCAA said the number of restored scholarships would continue to increase.

“While there is more work to be done, Penn State has clearly demonstrated its commitment to restoring integrity in its athletics program,” said George Mitchell, the former U.S. senator who was hired as the school’s athletics integrity monitor. “The university has substantially completed the initial implementation of all the Freeh Report recommendations and its obligations to the Athletics Integrity Agreement, so relief from the scholarship reductions is warranted and deserved.”

Penn State officials said in a separate statement that they were gratified by the decision to modify the sanctions, which they said will restore a total of 65 football scholarships.

“The action taken today by the NCAA, following its review of the positive report issued this month by Senator George Mitchell, recognizes the significant efforts over the past year to make Penn State a safer, stronger institution,” Penn State President Rodney Erickson said.  “This news is certainly welcome to our University community, particularly the student athletes who may want to attend Penn State and will now have the means to do so. As we promised throughout this process, we are committed to continuing to improve all of our policies, procedures and actions.”

The NCAA imposed unprecedented penalties, including a $60 million fine, on the State College, Pennsylvania-based school after a July 2012 report by former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Louis Freeh said top Penn State officials failed to protect children from Sandusky.

The initial punishment called for the NCAA to review the sanctions after two years, but Mitchell said the school had made enough progress to revisit them early.

He suggested the modifications focus on scholarships because that would most directly affect the athletes.

“This was a positive response to positive action,” Mitchell said on a media conference call, calling the modifications “a combination of both attitude and action that have been positive.”

Penn State is 3-1 this season, its only loss coming at home Sept. 14 against the University of Central Florida, 34-31. Last season was their first after sanctions had been leveled and the Nittany Lions went 8-4, including 6-2 in the Big Ten Conference, good for second place in the Leaders Division behind undefeated Ohio State. Both schools were banned from the postseason because of rules violations.

Sandusky, 69, who retired in 1999, was sentenced to at least 30 years in prison for abusing boys. He is seeking to reverse his conviction, claiming he didn’t get a fair trial.

During his sentencing on Oct. 9, 2012, he blamed his victims, attorneys and the media for making him out to be a “monster” who “did disgusting things.”

He was found guilty by a jury in June 2012 on 45 counts of abusing boys over a 15-year period. The abuse took place on the Penn State campus and at Sandusky’s home, according to testimony.

The scandal led to the firings of university President Graham Spanier and football coach Joe Paterno, who died in January 2012.

Spanier and two other school officials face related criminal charges.

Last month, the school agreed to settle claims brought by Sandusky’s victims for an undisclosed amount. It has spent almost $50 million on the scandal, including the first of five installments toward the $60 million NCAA fine.


  • It's all about money in the NCAA
    What kind of message does this send? How does this make the victims feel? Certainly not feeling the justice.
  • Penn State....Out!
    My opinion is that Penn State should be dropped from the Big Ten! The entire place tried to cover it up and there is nothing they can do that will make it right!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1