Nearly 4,000 students seek private-school vouchers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nearly 4,000 Hoosier students are using state-funded vouchers to attend private schools, according to the latest data from the Indiana Department of Education.

The program, which gives students an average of $4,500 from the state to apply toward private-school tuition, was created this year by the Indiana General Assembly. The Legislature placed an enrollment cap this year of 7,500 and will raise the cap next year to 15,000.

After that, there will be no cap on the program, which gives it the potential to be the largest voucher program in the United States. The program is limited, however, to students from low- to moderate-income households who have previously attended public schools.

There are more than 1 million students in K-12 public schools in Indiana, with nearly 100,000 in private schools, according to data from the Department of Education.

A total of 3,919 students received vouchers for the 2011-12 school year, up from the 3,200 who had received them as of late August—the last time the Department of Education reported the statistics. More than 250 private schools were approved to accept vouchers, and the biggest beneficiaries so far have been Catholic schools.

The students using vouchers came from 185 different school districts, out of about 350 total statewide. Eighty-five percent of the students come from families whose household incomes qualify them for free or reduced lunch, according to the Department of Education. Just over 30 percent of students are from rural and suburban Indiana, and more than half of the students represent minority households.

“Demographics do not determine a child’s ability to grow academically and should not determine the educational opportunities offered to any student,” said Tony Bennett, Indiana’s secretary of public instruction, in a prepared statement.



  • Ummm, Tim
    Try $7500 per student in IPS. You can read the whole article right on this very site
  • Value
    I live in Washington township and send 2 kids to private school (12k each) and worth every penny. Why is it that IPS can't come close when approximately 16k is appropriated per child??
  • Hmmm
    I wonder how many parents accepting these special education entitlements whine about welfare, food stamps, free lunch programs...If you want your kid to go to private school (especially religious ones), get a better job and pay for it yourselves.
  • Tired of me mentality
    Thanks city lady for offering the opportunity to comment on your inane suggestion. First we have to assume your parents paid for you to be privately educated and if not, that you have since reimbursed the state/city/county that provided your education since you won't tolerate a free ride (even if your parents paid property tax, keep in mind that in no way covered the full cost of your education for 12 years).

    With that out of the way, let's consider that as of 2007 the US Census data indicated 18% of those under the age of 18 were living below the poverty level. If you were to assume an equal distribution over the next highest income level, you would have at least 35-40% of the children in the US priced out of having any primary level education. If you thought things were bad now, imagine 40% of our population being illiterate since their parents couldn't afford to send them to school under your proposal. That would put us at a literacy rate on par with that of Haiti; how forward thinking! Parents couldn't home school either because they would be working their minimum wage job just to keep a roof over their children's heads.

    Since you don't want to pay for education, let's make sure you don't pay for fire protection, police protection, libraries, roads, sidewalks or any other of the myriad of items your property tax covers. I am sure all the fire, police and public health personnel would gladly come to your aid even though you didn't ask for a road to be built by your house, or a library, or a fire station, or a police station. They would be even more inclined to help since most of them were likely educated within a public school system like the vast majority of us were; unlike you who paid their own way for their K-12 education.

    Remember the constitution starts with 'We the people', not 'Me the people'. We don't all have to have doctorate degrees and you certainly have a right to disagree with the voucher program. However, suggesting we shouldn't put forth the effort to ensure every child has the opportunity to have a full primary education is incredibly short-sighted.
  • City Lady's Right
    Every person for themselves, and devil take the hindmost.
  • society
    I don't have kids either....and I'm happy to see my taxes go to public education. We are all part of society,a dn it behooves us to educate the young; as we age, they become the generation of majority making decisions that effect every part of lives; and I prefer to have those decisions made by an educated person; We owe it to ourselve as much as to the kids to educate them; I know that I do not enjoy being around ill mannered, uneducated youth, and there would be a much larger population of them if we didn't use our tax dollars to eductate the children.
  • Unnecessary
    If the public schools would put in $4500 per child for education maybe there wouldn't be a need for private schools. As a property owner, without children, I resent having to pay for kids that are not mine. Charge parents for sending their kids to school public or private, then that will end any appropriation of funding for schools. Make parents responsible for the education of their child in totality. Why should people who don't have children have to pay to educate other people's children? Why doesn't the Department of Education put their money into public schools and if parents aren't happy, let them pay for it themselves. If your child isn't learning, maybe your home life is the reason, private school won't help!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

    2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

    3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

    4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

    5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim